• @moistclump@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    672 years ago

    There’s a few reasons why he was charged, both as an actor and producer. Gun safety just can’t be fucked around with.

    In the document, prosecutors accused Baldwin of “many instances of extremely reckless acts” during the film’s production.

    They wrote that Baldwin “was not present” for mandatory firearms training before filming began. He was instead provided on-set guidance but prosecutors allege he was “distracted and talking on his cell phone to his family.” The training session was scheduled for an hour but was only 30 minutes long due to Baldwin’s “distraction” on the phone.

    … The prosecutor’s statement described several “acts or omissions of recklessness” on the set of Rust. This included foregoing the use of a prop gun during unscheduled rehearsals, willful ignorance toward on-set safety complaints and a lack of armourer-performed safety checks.

    https://globalnews.ca/news/9451182/alec-baldwin-rust-manslaughter-charge-phone/amp/

    • @Steeve@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      35
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I’m no lawyer or anything, but Baldwin has been an actor in professional movies with prop guns for a long time, I think it’s going to be hard for them to pin it on him (as an actor) for supposedly blowing off a single firearms course, and even that’s unconfirmed right? I think it’s unlikely that they’ll charge him as a producer as well, because it sounds like they hired all the right people for the job and had firearms training and everything.

      This whole thing just sounds like lawyers passing the buck back and forth, so who even knows what actually happened at this point. Will be interesting to see what comes up over time.

      • @beetus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -32 years ago

        “Yeah he blew off this years mandatory training, but he showed up to last years training, it can’t be his fault!”.

        Idk that doesn’t really seem like a valid excuse

        • @Steeve@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          122 years ago

          We’re talking manslaughter charges here, Baldwin’s lawyer doesn’t have to prove he’s not at fault, the prosecution has to prove without a reasonable doubt that he is at fault. Very different things.