First U.S. nuclear reactor built from scratch in decades enters commercial operation in Georgia::ATLANTA — A new reactor at a nuclear power plant in Georgia has entered commercial operation, becoming the first new American reactor built from scratch in decades.

  • irotsoma
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 years ago

    Too bad the energy companies essentially never dispose of the waste properly, because it’s too expensive if they want to give the huge bonuses to their CEOs and buyback thie stock. Even when doing it “properly” it’s basically just making it the problem of future generations once the concrete cracks.

    And to reprocess the waste and make it actually safe energy would mean no profit at all plus the tech doesn’t exist yet to actually build the reactors to reprocess the waste. I mean we understand the theory, but it would take at least a decade to engineer and build a prototype.

    Compare that to investing in battery tech which would have far reaching benefits. And combining that with renewables is much more profitable.

    • @fubo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 years ago

      Too bad the energy companies essentially never dispose of the waste properly

      To be fair, nuclear waste tends to be disposed of much more properly than coal waste.

      • irotsoma
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -62 years ago

        True, but still not anywhere near “clean” as it’s always marketed as.

          • irotsoma
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            How is solar, wind, or hydro not “clean”? The generating of the power, not the building of the facilities, building anything is never clean.

            • @dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              People count material, fuel and ecological with nuclear as well, so why not count it with hydro, wind and solar? Concrete is concrete.

              • irotsoma
                link
                fedilink
                English
                02 years ago

                Because all technology will require that. If we want energy, we have to build stuff. But there’s no fuel to buy, generally much less ecological impact due to limited waste products since no fuel is being “burned”. And the building cost is one time and generally subsidized, and maintenance is considerably lower, not to mention labor since you don’t need nuclear specialists to run the day to day.