• @zephyreks@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    542 years ago

    There needs to be trust in the justice system. Otherwise, there’s no point in having a justice system. If he’s cleared, then there wasn’t enough evidence and he should be considered innocent. That’s how our justice system works. Don’t break the social contract because of your vendetta against rich people.

    The problem is that our society doesn’t encourage people to immediately report crimes nor provide sufficient support for people who have been abused.

    • @r1veRRR@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      182 years ago

      Innocence is VERY SPECIFICALLY NOT WHAT COURTS declare. They only ever declare that there wasn’t enough evidence presented to proof guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

        • @r1veRRR@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          Considered innocent, by the state organs. Considered innocent, in how the state treats them. NOT EVER AT ALL PROVEN innocent by the courts.

          Courts are not and have never been concerned about proving innocence. All they care about is guilty or not guilty. Not guilty could mean innocent, but again, the courts don’t care about that.

        • @acosmichippo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          In terms of punishment from the government, yes. The court of public opinion is another matter entirely. Civil court too.

      • Well maybe we can fantasize about vigilante justice from masked super heroes then. Who somehow can right with punches in the middle of the night what courts couldn’t figure out with extensive investigations.

        Or maybe we could get a serial killer to figure it all out and judge Dredd that shit.

        • @Syndic@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          Or we accept that our justice system can’t be perfect and accept that there won’t be any legal ramification against Spacey. Sexual assault charges always are hard to prove if you don’t get physical prove right after the crime. That’s even more so when the crime happened years ago. The fact we have to accept is that quite a lot of guilty people will walk free from such a crime.

          But that doesn’t mean we all now have to believe he’s innocent and it certainly doesn’t mean we all have to ignore that and be forced to watch further movies with him.

      • @Boiglenoight@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -22 years ago

        And OJ went on to live a long, happy, and peaceful life. I was especially glad to see him being honored by Hollywood and the NFL.

    • @n2burns@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      and he should be considered innocent not guilty.

      FTFY. Words have meanings and those meanings are important.

        • @r1veRRR@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          NO! That is how the court system, and therefore the state sees him in regards to punishment and treatment. That does not mean, and has never ever ever ever meant, that being declared not guilty means they are proven to be innocent. Just that there’s wasn’t evidence beyond a reasonable doubt.

      • @zephyreks@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Innocent until proven guilty is literally the fundamental basis of our justice system. He is innocent by definition.