• @gibmiser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -36
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Sexy. Be safe, remember kids, always use use PPE when committing domestic terrorism!

    Edit: fucking lol you guys I support what they are doing. I just think it’s funny that it probably fits the technical definition of domestic terrorism even if we don’t consider it that.

    • @Schmoo@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      7410 months ago

      This is not terrorism, it’s industrial sabotage, which in the context of the coal industry is based.

      • @alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        -110 months ago

        Terrorism doesn’t have an agreed upon definition, we’ve charged people with terrorism for occupying a forest, we’ve also done it for flying a plane into a building. The only unifying factor is a political action the government doesn’t sanction.

        • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          1110 months ago

          Which is ridiculous and should be called out as such. Meanwhile we’re letting grown men with guns threaten kids over religious ideas.

          It’s like we all forgot what terrorism actually is.

        • poVoq
          link
          fedilink
          710 months ago

          It has a clear definition. Maybe look it up some time?

            • poVoq
              link
              fedilink
              610 months ago

              Of course this includes many states. That doesn’t mean the term is useless, you just don’t like the implication of that.

              • @alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                -2
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Except people don’t use it that way. If you say “I live in Syria and I am afraid of a terrorist attack”, 99/100 people would not understand what you said to possibly mean that you were afraid of the US drone striking you.

                If they did, and anyone can use the term to refer to most any political organization and action that is associated with attacks on non-combatants, it becomes useless.

                • poVoq
                  link
                  fedilink
                  810 months ago

                  You would be surprised how many people outside of the west correctly identify US drone strikes as terrorist attacks. And no, that does not make the term meaningless at all.

        • @grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          310 months ago

          In the absence of consensus my opinion prevails (because I said so), and I say the thing OP referenced doesn’t count as terrorism. Anyone who disagrees with me is, to put it simply, wrong.

          (Occupying a forest sure as Hell doesn’t count either, by the way – and that’s one I can speak about with particular authority, being a resident of a nearby neighborhood and personal acquaintances with some of the people involved. Frankly, the Atlanta Police Department and Georgia State Patrol are the terrorists here: their actions have not been legitimate enforcing of laws, but rather the acts of a gang trying to claim turf to build their jackbooted-thuggery theme park.)

    • @_stranger_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      3010 months ago

      If you’re terrified at the thought of a coal company being mildly inconvenienced, check those perls you’re clutching; they might actually be diamonds by now.

      • @gibmiser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        210 months ago

        I think disrupting national infrastructure can be considered terrorism, it just amused me thinking of good guys non violently being “good guy” terrorists