so we already know that youtube doesn’t like people freeloading their bandwidth using something like invidious, piped, newpipe etc. why don’t they just close the public web api and require a login or something. by requiring login they can keep track of what users are watching and if a user is watching thousands of videos daily they can rate limit that user.

are they afraid of losing their user if they do so? I personally don’t think it can affect their business or profit. It will cut down their cost of bandwidth and computation costs. so why don’t just cut off users that don’t bring any revenue??

  • @cAUzapNEAGLb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    621 year ago

    Reddit did that and then instantly multiple serious competitors began to siphon off their power users both out of principle and practicality, it was the straw that broke the camel’s back.

    YouTube i think understands to not cross the line because if they no longer have a monopoly on mid to long form content their golden goose dies. People are already on edge after a long sequence of attacks against non-premium users.

    Personally, If they do do that, and at least some amount of the channels I care about move to a different platform, I’ll happily move with them and cancel my YouTube premium.

    • whoareuOP
      link
      fedilink
      131 year ago

      what if YouTube crosses the line. which corporation is interested and have enough computing power to make a YouTube alternative?

      • @YourAvgMortal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        171 year ago

        Meta made a twitter clone when they had the chance, they’ll happily make a YouTube clone.

        I don’t think Amazon or Microsoft are very interested in entering that market, but they are the only ones with the money and compute to support such a platform.

        Maybe Netflix could be interested? But I doubt it

        • @NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          25
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          People have seriously suggested that Mindgeek (Pornhub) could do it. Video content delivery infrastructure is eye-wateringly expensive but Mindgeek’s systems already deliver petabytes of content a day.

          This was memed a lot but if they seriously get involved then I think there’s a good chance that their competitor would genuinely be successful as long as they can correctly distance themselves from the pornography aspect of their business.

          Edit: They also own algorithms to find and recommend videos to users, robust commenting and user interaction features on their platform, and the placement and frequency of advertising are more or less acceptable on their platform.

          • @ominouslemon@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            41 year ago

            No, even if they wanted to, they have no expertise in UGC and they don’t have the infrastructure to do any of that

            • @Jarix@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              31 year ago

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QuickTime?wprov=sfla1

              Quicktime was awesome. They could revisit what worked well about it.

              They have deep deep pockets and could throw money at it if they wanted to be come after the market.

              They already have a zealous fanbase that will ignore flaws.

              I think they could do it, if they wanted to. Would take time and they would have to bleed money for a while, anyone who tries to take on youtube would have to though

          • Kn3cht
            link
            fedilink
            -21 year ago

            They can’t even get Apple TV to work correctly on a mac.

      • @cAUzapNEAGLb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        Off the top of my head

        Potentially odeysee, peertube, or maybe even twitch, more likely I could see subscription platforms like patreon and nebula taking over

        Potentially something entirely new, I don’t know

      • @Num10ck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        i’d love to see a peer-to-peer blockchain youtube replacement. like a limewire/napster type thing with thumbnails and discovery.

      • @Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Even with their recent efforts to squeeze money out of their users by killing adblockers and pushing even more intrusive ads, they still don’t make a profit. And that’s with 100% of the market share. There just isn’t a way for another company to come in and unseat youtube, and youtube knows it. Hence why they feel they can get away with pretty much any anti-consumer move they can dream up.

        They just have to keep users happy enough that nobody at microsoft/amazon decides to start their own money pit out of spite, and all that tasty data remains theirs for the indefinite future.