so we already know that youtube doesn’t like people freeloading their bandwidth using something like invidious, piped, newpipe etc. why don’t they just close the public web api and require a login or something. by requiring login they can keep track of what users are watching and if a user is watching thousands of videos daily they can rate limit that user.

are they afraid of losing their user if they do so? I personally don’t think it can affect their business or profit. It will cut down their cost of bandwidth and computation costs. so why don’t just cut off users that don’t bring any revenue??

  • @YourAvgMortal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    171 year ago

    Meta made a twitter clone when they had the chance, they’ll happily make a YouTube clone.

    I don’t think Amazon or Microsoft are very interested in entering that market, but they are the only ones with the money and compute to support such a platform.

    Maybe Netflix could be interested? But I doubt it

    • @NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      25
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      People have seriously suggested that Mindgeek (Pornhub) could do it. Video content delivery infrastructure is eye-wateringly expensive but Mindgeek’s systems already deliver petabytes of content a day.

      This was memed a lot but if they seriously get involved then I think there’s a good chance that their competitor would genuinely be successful as long as they can correctly distance themselves from the pornography aspect of their business.

      Edit: They also own algorithms to find and recommend videos to users, robust commenting and user interaction features on their platform, and the placement and frequency of advertising are more or less acceptable on their platform.

      • @ominouslemon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        No, even if they wanted to, they have no expertise in UGC and they don’t have the infrastructure to do any of that

        • @Jarix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QuickTime?wprov=sfla1

          Quicktime was awesome. They could revisit what worked well about it.

          They have deep deep pockets and could throw money at it if they wanted to be come after the market.

          They already have a zealous fanbase that will ignore flaws.

          I think they could do it, if they wanted to. Would take time and they would have to bleed money for a while, anyone who tries to take on youtube would have to though

      • Kn3cht
        link
        fedilink
        -21 year ago

        They can’t even get Apple TV to work correctly on a mac.