• stankmut
    link
    fedilink
    -301 year ago

    They say in the article that reviewers were told about the microtransactions. Then they mention that one reviewer said he didn’t read the notes that were sent by Capcom. Why would this reviewer need to go back and rescore the game? If he enjoyed it without knowing about the microtransactions, they clearly don’t matter to the gameplay.

      • stankmut
        link
        fedilink
        -301 year ago

        That’s my point. Reviewers gave it great scores when there weren’t any microtransactions and they haven’t changed anything in the game to make those microtransactions important. You can play the game the exact same way the reviewers did by just ignoring them.

        • @optissima@lemmy.ml
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          14
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          ~~You misunderstand, the mtx were essentially unlocked in the reviewers versions, not simply missing features. ~~

          Edit: apparently my last edit didn’t get submitted somehow, but I’m sorry about being misinformed and unintentionally spreading it. What I was told was wrong as it was spin that I read of what did happen: the those features were unlocked in the reviews… because they’re in the game, this was conveniently left out. Then I misread that as the games otherwise not having those features.

          • stankmut
            link
            fedilink
            -11
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I haven’t seen anything that has said that. I couldn’t find that in the article either.

            Edit: I don’t care about the downvotes, but surely one of you could’ve replied with a link showing me where it says that reviewers had the mtx unlocked for them while reviewing.