• I think the whole game should be reviewed and that includes the microtransactions. There’s a reason they add them after the reviews are in because they know people don’t like to be nickel and dimed in a game that costs 60 to 70 fucking dollars.

        • @Breezy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -461 year ago

          Microtransactions arent the game though. And none of whats for sale makes a bit of difference to the game. Not to mention everything you can buy is in the game already, it wasnt taken out or put behind a paywall.

          Do you also rate a game negatively if they have a battle pass? What about other capcom games like the resident evil remakes where you could buy the unlocked infinite weapons for 5 dollars? Do either take away from the actual game? No, no they do not.

          Its still not great, i agree, but it doesnt make a good game bad just because you think its scummy. I say this, but i do not have the game nor will i be getting it. Not because of people online crying about a nothing burger, but i just dont have a system strong enough to play it. If i did, i would because i loved the original game.

          • @stardust@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            39
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yes because I’m not getting the game for free so things like performance and monetization impact my purchasing decisions and what price I’m willing to pay for it, which is what I rely on reviews for. I don’t see reviews as some art piece analysis. I don’t care only about what someone thinks about the gameplay when it comes to spending money.

          • I think they are the game as the developers can base their game around them (remember battlefront 2?) It’s a paid game, 70 dollars no less, and I’m sorry, but there is no justification for microtransactions.

            How come Baldur’s Gate 3 can be without microtransactions for example? It’s greed pure and simple. If they didn’t want you to buy them, and there weren’t people putting in ridiculous amounts of money in them they wouldn’t put them in.

        • @Cold_Brew_Enema@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          -581 year ago

          Hey wise guy. I have this amazing solution for that. It’s called not fucking buying them. People are losing their shit about this, yet helldivers 2 does the exact same thing and no one gives a shit.

      • @olicvb@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        411 year ago

        except the version of the game they reviewed allegedly didn’t have the micro-transactions/paywalls

          • @SweatyFireBalls@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            101 year ago

            The MTX items are in game, the rumour that you can’t fast travel and stuff blatantly false.

            Capcom did some scummy shit, but the reason they(the press) didn’t know is because even now post release the game makes no mention of them.

            The limited travel, resurrections, and the currency for pawns were all in the first game and they all feel just as common in my experience.

            So fuck Capcom, but the game does deserve the reviews it got imo. However, they also deserve all the backlash they are getting, because they intentionally kept it quiet. They knew players would be upset. It’s gross.

        • @baconisaveg@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          -31 year ago

          The released game doesn’t have paywalls either. I guess you’re incapable of understanding the issues you feel obliged to complain about.

        • @IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -201 year ago

          The game didn’t change though. The items are still in game, have the same in game prices. Fundamentally it’s the same game.

      • @BleatingZombie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        Why would somebody only review a portion of the game you’re playing?

        It’s like reading a movie review where the author showed up 30 minutes late to the movie

        • @baconisaveg@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          -51 year ago

          It’s literally not. It’s like reading a positive review for a movie and then going to see it and being outraged the theater is charging $14 for popcorn. No one is forcing you to buy the popcorn, and not buying it in no way affects your movie experience.

          Don’t you have more important things to be outraged about? Isn’t it exhausting hating everything all at once?

        • @frunch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          Can you suggest other sites that don’t come with that baggage but still curate worthwhile content?