This has happened once before and they reversed it. But they said this last time too:

The discussions that have happened in various threads on Lemmy make it very clear that removing the communites before we announced our intent to remove them is not the level of transparency the community expects, and that as stewards of this community we need to be extremely transparent before we do this again in the future as well as make sure that we get feedback around what the planned changes are, because lemmy.world is yours as much as it is ours.

https://lemmy.world/post/3234363

  • @taladar@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    -171 year ago

    Seems quite reasonable to remove illegal communities given how Lemmy works with the caching of all content locally. There is just a significant legal risk for the instance operators involved here.

        • Amerikan Pharaoh
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          Then arrest the execs making those incentives; not the consumers taking and distributing notes on them.

    • Amerikan Pharaoh
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Wannabe capitalist-tier commenting; tfu. Your breath reeks of Oxford polish and your brain is poisoned by vain, childish notions of ‘owning’ ideas like there’s just an infinite supply of those under the sun.

    • sadreality
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      How do you define “illegal community”

      Asking for a friend