• @AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    214
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    And remember, because I feel this always needs to be said with such sums…

    193 million isn’t enough for him, and 193 million plus whatever millions he made in years prior isn’t enough for him. He’s going public because he’s a broken, disturbed human being that looks at his unethical levels of wealth, enough for most of the other humans that live here to live 2 dozen extravagant lifetimes, and still demands mooooooaaaaaar.

    Why isn’t this widely accepted as severe mental illness?! This is hoarding disorder.

    These aren’t big ocean house sums. These are buying politicians sums, and they are only achievable through exploiting other human beings and selfishly pocketing most of the value of their labor because you can get away with it.

    • @positiveWHAT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      511 year ago

      Is it possible to set a roof on private wealth? Everything above put into public funds? Give them a “you win at capitalism” trophy and let them into some other game to play.

      • @AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        53
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes.

        Enforced, adequately high progressive taxation could do that, in fact we had tax rates closer akin to that prior to Reagan, and at one point our highest tax rate was close to 90% as it should be so as to limit accruing enough wealth to warp our society unilaterally beyond their single vote with media and political bribery, but that died a long time ago in the name of “turning the bull loose.”

        But then the greediest fucks among us bribed our leaders to get their way, to thunderous applause by idiot conservative peasants and many so called democrats, today’s neoliberals, and here we are, planet burning, terminal stage capitalism, good fucking times. But hey, as long as Bezos can have a second mega yacht to keep his first mega yacht company (he really does look it up) I guess it was all worth our impending collapse.

        • @Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          181 year ago

          You know what people did when the highest tax rate was 90%? They made sure they’d still “max out” 25 years from now. They invested in their company reputation and their workers.

      • @ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        191 year ago

        The 1950s had a great thing going. Once you hit $100,000 in a year, anything beyond that was taxed at about 90%. Nobody wanted to give the government 90% of what they’d be making, so no one did, and the 1950’s were absolutely booming for the US middle and lower class. You could afford a new house, car, and two kids at a job you didn’t need a college diploma for (or often even a highschool diploma) on a single income household.

        Without having to pay ridiculous sums of money to the ceo’s and executives and whatnot, companies were just left with the option of using the funds to invest back into their companies and their employees instead going after pocketing as much money as quickly as possible.

      • Not only would I be willing to give them a trophy, give them a fucking parade, shout-out at the next SOTU, let them sign the original constitution or some shit, whatever the fuck these mentally ill people need to stop destroying society.

        Hell keep a leaderboard of who “produced” the most wealth and let them compete with each other. The winner every year gets their name carved in a new " Stanley Cup of Captalism" (the hockey one, not the crazy white lady one). All of that shit would be infinitely cheaper than having billionaires around.

    • TWeaK
      link
      fedilink
      English
      251 year ago

      After they introduced reddit gold, they made enough money to finance the service beyond anyone’s lifetime. Now, all that money is gone.

      Reddit has been mismanaged, just like almost every silicon valley or venture capitalist driven business. The goal isn’t to make a business profitable, let alone one that is sustainable or serves society, the goal is to meet a certain arbitrary metric that only serves shareholders at the expense of anything and everyone else.

    • @kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      12
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Once you get to that level of wealth it becomes a mentally ill competition game. It’s no longer about the money or what you could or will do with the money, it’s trying to get yourself into higher tiers of even more abhorrent wealth accumulation.

      “How did you get here? Business class?”

      Laughs the people with private jets

      “Where are you staying? A resort?”

      Laughs the people with a house in every city

      “Where will you go when we end the world? Not my bunker”

      Laughs at the people without bunkers

    • Exocrinous
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Why isn’t this widely accepted as severe mental illness?! This is hoarding disorder.

      Doctors don’t diagnose people with “evil”. That’s what priests and philosophers are for. Doctors diagnose people with illnesses and injuries. Things that negatively impact the patient.

          • @BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            There’s been plenty of stories that have come out that it took a relatively small amount to buy important votes. At this point they should just crowd fund buying out these guys. At least it would drive the price up and make it more transparent how shitty some of these people are.

      • P03 Locke
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        Hell no… Politicians are cheap AF. You could buy a senator to lobby for your bill for $20K.

        For $200M, you could buy the entire senate, house, and presidency for a year.