• @SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -71 year ago

      Still not how that works, if he wants cash he has to sell, selling stocks is heavily taxed. Now he can take a loan against the stocks but if they don’t do well then he’s not going to get much for them. It’s a risk and taxes is paid like it or not.

      Still a shit system, but that’s a different discussion, but they pay taxes.

      • @Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        161 year ago

        I wouldn’t say heavily taxed. If he exercised his options more than 6 months ago he’ll pay the flat 15% capital gains tax. Whereas his effective tax rate on his salary will be around 30%

          • @RaoulDook@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            I have read that that’s one of the wealthy’s “big secret” ways to avoid taxes. They allegedly live off of those loans as their spending money, while the value of the investments they use as collateral increases over time, but they don’t pay taxes on the Unrealized gains. And they can keep borrowing more as needed with those same investments as collateral.

            I don’t have the whole scam figured out though. I’m not sure how they pay back the loans without having to cash out something that would generate a tax burden.

            • @nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              71 year ago

              I’m assuming s long s they spread out payments over time and roll lots of the debt into the next loan.

              That’s how they become too big to fail at their banks. At least that’s the Donald Trump method. His problem is that he has fuck all for collateral at this point.

      • Natanael
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        The interest rate on taking loans against assets is usually less than paying the taxes for selling the same assets

        • falsem
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          It’s taxed as income when you receive it. If you hold onto it for over a year then sell it you pay capital gains (which are lower) on the difference between the grant price and current price (if it went up).

        • @SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          If they sell after holding it for more than a year, if they short term sell the stock under a year it’s a normal income tax on said stock.

            • @SupraMario@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              I’m not disagreeing with you, I think it’s a shit system as well, I’m just pointing out what a lot of people seem to think is 0 taxes on stocks.

        • @SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          That still requires you to make sure the stock are worth something, and you have to pay interest on that loan.

          I think people are thinking I’m defending the system, I’m not, I’m just pointing out how it works.