@issue0315@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agoControversial benchmarking website goes behind paywall — Userbenchmark now requires a $10 monthly subscriptionwww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square63fedilinkarrow-up1517arrow-down111cross-posted to: hardware@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1506arrow-down1external-linkControversial benchmarking website goes behind paywall — Userbenchmark now requires a $10 monthly subscriptionwww.tomshardware.com@issue0315@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square63fedilinkcross-posted to: hardware@lemmy.ml
minus-square@casmael@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish48•1 year agoRight so clearly userbenchmark is trash, but where could one, hypothetically, go, to, hypothetically, compare the performance of various cpus, hypothetically?
minus-square@iliketurtles@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish11•1 year agoI like nanoreview https://nanoreview.net/en/cpu-compare
minus-squareferretlinkfedilinkEnglish5•1 year agoThe phoronix testing site can be alright, if a little haphazard and spotty
Right so clearly userbenchmark is trash, but where could one, hypothetically, go, to, hypothetically, compare the performance of various cpus, hypothetically?
openbenchmarking.org
I like nanoreview https://nanoreview.net/en/cpu-compare
The phoronix testing site can be alright, if a little haphazard and spotty