• @Snekeyes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -61 year ago

    “Research has found that bitcoin miners alone consume approximately between 60 to 125 TWh of energy annually, which is equivalent to around 0.6% of global electricity”

    “Traditional banks’ total annual energy consumption of traditional banks is around 26 TWh on running servers, 26 TWh on ATMs, and 87 TWh from an estimate of 600k+ branches worldwide. Totaling 139 TWh.”

    Not to mention banks impact on people’s lives. Limited purchasing power of the poor and soon to join them middle class… to purchase disposable products

    https://www.iyops.org/post/energy-consumption-cryptocurrency-vs-traditional-banks

    • @Pulptastic@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Compare Wh vs # transactions. PoW is unsustainable and irresponsible. We need a different way.

      I’ve always been a fan of having the USPS provide banking services to everyone. Make it a public service and it is no longer exclusionary.

    • @merdaverse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Proof of work is not even scalable to the level of current bank transactions. Ethereum network didn’t have enough compute to clear the backlog created by some niche cat NFT “game” a few years ago when people still gave a shit about NFTs.

      Limited purchasing power of the poor and middle class is a political problem, not a problem solved by tech, no matter what crypto gurus and tech messiahs will tell you. The most prolific crypto miners are the ones that already have more “traditional” capital to invest. So crypto is not solving the wealth divide, it is just making it worse.

      I hate banks as much as anyone, but crypto is not the solution.