

Yes, you might be right on that. But nobody said all ads had to be effective! ;) They sure are getting a lot of attention… maybe this backfires, maybe they get something out of it, we don’t know their expectations.


Yes, you might be right on that. But nobody said all ads had to be effective! ;) They sure are getting a lot of attention… maybe this backfires, maybe they get something out of it, we don’t know their expectations.


Below the vote was a link to see what an internet with AI is, or something like that. I went and asked their AI if all this was just a blatant ad for their AI, and it gave me a long, long list of excuses, after which I told it: come on, just say yes or no, and it replied back: yes, it could be said to be a blatant ad :D


Techmoan, if you are interested in old or weird tech.


I’ve seen kids with Nirvana t-shirts who knew nothing about the band. This might be similar.


Not even unique I’d argue. He was lucky Digg killed itself at the right moment.
surf-club I’m making it a habit to hit that “random” link daily. Already spent quite some time at a few sites. Even when they are no longer being updated all of them are interesting in their own ways and, funnily, refreshing (given the current modern web). Thank you!
WTF??? That’s amazing! Thank you for wasting my time -a lot of it- in the best possible way ;)
Message aside, the site is cool, love that you can change the style, and the icon animation on the last one is brilliant. Also: a webring! It’s been a long time since I saw one. I need more of this web and I’m happy to rediscover it.


As annoying as she was, Fi from Skyward Sword almost made me cry at the end of the game. Well, a couple of tears.
You have 3 possible reasons: A) those stats aren’t that accurate; B) “unique” is not that unique (same person counted more than once through the month); and C) it might also include bots. Maybe it’s a mix of the 3.