• Savaran
    link
    fedilink
    English
    501 year ago

    Keep in mind, the last PowerPC (G5) chipset used was 64bit, and all Intel chips used after late 2006 were 64bit.

    • m-p{3}
      link
      fedilink
      English
      271 year ago

      It does means that some legacy games that are only available in 32-bit binaries will no longer work though.

      • atocci
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        Just on MacOS though, I don’t think Windows will be dropping 32 bit support ever.

  • @aeronmelon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Those of us that already have Steam games installed on Mojave will no longer be able to update? Or will Gaben reach into my computer and forbid me access to content I paid for?

    Edit: All this anger for asking a relevant question. I learned my lesson.

    • atocci
      link
      fedilink
      191 year ago

      The move means existing Steam Client installations on those operating systems will no longer receive updates of any kind, including security updates.

      We expect the Steam client and games on these older operating systems to continue running for some time.

      The company is encouraging all High Sierra and Mojave users to update “sooner rather than later” and noted that Apple ended security updates and technical support for both operating systems in December 2020 and October 2021, respectively.

      • @aeronmelon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -81 year ago

        I read that.

        The article, and Steam’s quotes, don’t say either or with any certainty, so I’ll have to wait and find out.

        • atocci
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          From what I can gather, it sounds like things will keep working until something changes on the back-end that leaves the old Steam client unable to connect anymore. I don’t think they can’t say when that will be exactly though because it depends on future updates.

          • @aeronmelon@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            Figures.

            Most software I use that dropped support for Mojave already at least let me use older builds in peace.

            I appreciate your trying to help clear it up.

            • @Goronmon@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              41 year ago

              The problem is when those “older builds” rely on a connection to a back-end. If this was just a standalone piece of software that is one thing, but you can’t just let out-of-date clients that connect over the internet to run indefinitely.

              • @aeronmelon@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                The games I bought are stand-alone pieces of software. The gatekeeper needed to run those games is another story.

    • atocci
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      What about it is misinformation? It’s practically just Steam’s own announcement worded differently. Everything in it is verifiable and supported by the Steam blog post.

      • @Shadywack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        First off it’s confusing as hell where they try to paraphrase or summarize for what Valve already said plainly if you bypass this blogspam article and just go to their support page where they spell everything out neatly that any 32-bit games will remain in your library and accessible, albeit that your OS may not place nice. This article almost makes it as if they’re removing stuff from your library, which Valve clearly says they’re not doing. The summary AI bot would do a better job sourcing the Valve blog update than this writer did.

        • Brawler Yukon
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 year ago

          This article almost makes it as if they’re removing stuff from your library

          But it doesn’t remotely imply that? Here are the words/phrases it uses to describe what will happen:

          • Steam will halt support for macOS 10.13 and 10.14
          • existing Steam Client installations on those operating systems will no longer receive updates of any kind, including security updates
          • some games will effectively stop functioning on macOS
          • The Steam store will stop considering games that offer only 32-bit macOS binaries to be Mac compatible at the end of 2023.

          At no point does it say or imply that anything will be removed from your library. In fact, it explicitly says how you can ensure that those games you own will remain playable:

          In order to ensure continued operation of Steam and new 64-bit games purchased through Steam, users on these older versions should update to a more recent version of macOS.

          Why would they include that if they’re trying to tell people the games will be removed from their library?

          Stop fearmongering.

        • atocci
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Is it possible you might be looking at this old support page from when MacOS first dropped support for 32 bit apps but Valve was still supporting the 32-bit client for older MacOS versions? The current page is this one. I doubt they’ll be removing games from your libraries at any point, but the new article makes it clear that they aren’t supporting the 32-bit Mojave Steam client or 32-bit games on Mac anymore and make no guarantees that they’ll continue to work when the client stops getting updates.

          After February 15th, 2024, we will no longer support macOS 10.14 or earlier and we are unable to guarantee continued functionality of 32-bit macOS games after that date.