• @NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    401 year ago

    I haven’t forgotten how BP used chemicals to make all the oil just sink to the bottom of the gulf so people would forget what they did quicker. We don’t deserve this planet.

      • @NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        121 year ago

        While submerging the oil with dispersant may lessen exposure to marine life on the surface, it increases exposure for animals dwelling underwater, who may be harmed by toxicity of both dispersed oil and dispersant. Although dispersant reduces the amount of oil that lands ashore, it may allow faster, deeper penetration of oil into coastal terrain, where it is not easily biodegraded.

        Sorry if I didn’t use the exact terminology you deemed appropriate. Either way I don’t find my description is incorrect. They used the dispersant to push the issue below the surface of the water.

        • @sartalon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -81 year ago

          Nice cherry picking.

          Here, let me provide link, from the EPA:

          https://www.epa.gov/emergency-response/dispersants

          “Dispersants can be applied on surface oil or below the surface, closer to an uncontrolled release of crude oil from a well blowout source. In an oil spill, these smaller oil droplets disperse into the water column where they are transported by currents and subjected to other natural processes such as dissolution and biodegradation.”

          There are plenty of arguments against the use of dispersants, not the least of which is the toxicity of the dispersant itself. However there is a strong argument that supports it as the lesser of two evils.

          People should have gone to jail over the BP spill. So many flagrant safety violations and illegal behavior were identified.

          But you’ll never forget the “submerging of the oil”.

          If you are going to virtue signal, at least base it off a real issue.

          • @NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The issue that the dispersant was controversial at the time and the jury is still out on if it helped or hurt? I’m glad we agree. I find it really weird how hostile you are

            My point was BP didn’t care if it helped or it hurt, they knew it would hide the oil with either outcome.

            • @sartalon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -41 year ago

              You are just another internet activist that has a very vague understanding of how shit works in real life and virtue signal for upvotes.

              You could have said something like, “I will never forget the environmental catastrophe that BP caused.” and I would have upvoted and moved on.

              But you spoke like you knew what the hell you were talking about and someone else is going to read it and be like, “Yeah, they submerged the oil, fuck BP!” and your little rant just added to the useless noise that drowns out real facts.

              You are NOT helping.

              Misinformation hurts, no matter why you do it.

              Just go back to reddit if all you want is upvotes.

              • @NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -21 year ago

                I’d rather “virtue signal” over being an argumentative iamverysmart pedant. Now that’s something I wish stayed on Reddit and yet here you are. Have a nice life you miserable fuck

                • @sartalon@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -11 year ago

                  You make up shit and call me the pedant. Fine, I’ll be blunt.

                  You are a liar and you make the internet a worse place by filling it with noise.

                  Next time you want to comment, at least have the decency to know what the you are talking about.

      • @TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        oh god i forgot south park did a bit on this. i feel dirty now. was not meant to be a south park reference. just that this shit keeps happening

      • @Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Just so more people know, South Park was off the mark in their criticism of that. The “We’re Sorry” ad campaign was just a form of soft bribery so the media outlets would play softball with their coverage of the disaster.

  • @aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The inevitable sequel to “drill baby drill” entitled “spill baby spill” was not enjoyed as enthusiastically as the oil companies had hoped.

  • @sartalon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    That reporter/editor should be fined or charged with this blatant bullshit.

    “The U S. Coast Guard said Monday that an estimated 1.1 million gallons of crude oil has leaked into the Gulf…” and linked the actual press release in that line.

    When you actually read the press release, and then lower in the article, it says the amount is actually unknown.

    They know how much oil the pipeline holds, which would be around that estimate. It could only be a couple hundred gallons that have actually leaked.

    Also they are not even sure where the leak is, so it might not even be the named company’s fault.

    Yeah oil industry sucks, but this sounds like a fat nothing burger that CBS is pumping for clicks. No wonder no one trusts the media.

    (This is a reposted comment from when this bullshit article was posted earlier)

    The OP of this repost didn’t even have the decency to share the qualifications from inside the article.

    They are just as terrible of an attention seeking whore as the writer of the article.

    • Brave Little Hitachi Wand
      link
      fedilink
      English
      151 year ago

      The danger, as the article says, is letting them continue to operate in the area. At what point do we say “okay we’ve nearly totally fucked this place up, find someplace else”

      • @steventhedev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        Ideally? Back in 2010 when BP made it clear they were systemically hiding critical safety and environmental control failures.

        • themeatbridge
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago. The next best time is right now.

          It may be too late to save humanity, but it’s never too late to do the right thing.

    • @Doxatek@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Comparing a bad thing to another bad thing that was larger doesn’t make the lesser not also still a bad thing. Not that you necessarily think that of course but some people use this as a defense quite often. “Like x person in history killed a million people but I only murdered one why are you so mad at me?!How am I bad!” haha

  • @naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    Turns out, building your entire economy and financial system on O&G causes problems for the environment, huh?