I imagine this is about financial chicanery or sex pesting but the funniest outcome would be if they just replaced him with ChatGPT to save money. If there’s any job a chatbot can do today, it’s CEO.
financial chicanery
I’m sure he’s failing to find further funding in the current interest rate market and their business model frankly has no profitability end in sight. Running all those computing resources for free is a road to ruin.
It actually seems to be the opposite - Altman focussing on commercialization, whereas the board wants to continue the non-commercial focus.
I really hope this is the case.
Hahahahahahahaha… A board more interested in non-profit work vs making more money? Sorry, I think this is way over optimistic.
It’s a non-profit board; the members do not hold equity and the for-profit subsidiary has a profit allocation cap. It is not the same as a for-profit board.
Maybe there is hope and closedAI can become open ai again?
deleted by creator
Not to mention be sued by everyone whose copyrighted work was used.
That was my guess. I can imagine a situation where he was deliberately understating or obfuscating how vulnerable they were in that regard, or else simply overconfident they were legally in the clear.
AI has been replacing the board members and now has control of the company
The evitable conflict looms
The reasons are probably fairly boring but it’d be kinda funny if they hit AGI and now everyone is in freakout mode behind the scenes.
deleted by creator
This is a turning point that could be either really good or bad, depending on who you ask. Senior developers also left due to the news.
Guess he wasn’t open after all.
Isn’t this this the plot of Silicon Valley?
deleted by creator
Chat GPT would’ve given him a heads up if he asked…
Didn’t everyone leave the company? I was reading that also the head of research is gone
All of the senior positions are now listed as Clippy. I have a bad feeling about this…
All good bro, they automated their processes with AI, so now they need fewer employees
/s
Awful lot of comments here pretending he didn’t rape his sister. I wonder why.
Edit: I love that the replies I’m getting literally prove my point. Real repulsive shit.
Because its both irrelevant to the topic (unless that’s the reason he was fired, which I doubt) and a mere allegation. Innocent until proven guilty.
I’m betting the board doesn’t think incest rape is good for the brand. Good thing he has heroes like you to defend him, otherwise raping his sister might actually tarnish his image.
