Companies With Flexible Remote Work Policies Outperform On Revenue Growth::According to a new report, companies with flexible remote work policies outperform firms with more restrictive policies when it comes to revenue growth rates.

    • The Assman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      152 years ago

      I had that happen at the start of COVID. Then I went to another wfh job. Then that job started forcing two days in office a week 😑

    • prole
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      i.e. a company that understands the sunk cost fallacy.

  • @phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    862 years ago

    I am LESS productive in the office. It’s distracting. I have to commute. There is less time for hyper focus.

    These results don’t surprise at all.

    • @aidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      I’m definitely more productive in the office, doesn’t mean I hate it any less though.

  • @RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    592 years ago

    Not surprised, I’ve seen a lot of people say they are willing to work for less if they can work from home. Those who support WFH will get the best talent cheaper.

    • @Skies5394@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 years ago

      I had a recruiter after me hard one time. They had a company they were trying to grow and had already plucked away a couple of guys from my team.

      He offered what he thought was an aggressive offer based on what the other guys said they were making.

      I asked about WFH, he said the company preferred people in the office to collaborate. This was my third time asking this, the first two times I told him this was a non-starter, and this offer was to try to go above and beyond that to sway me with dollar signs.

      I laid out the costs that were involved: commuting, car, gas, childcare, lunch, etc. and how his aggressive offer still had me coming up behind, and that’s before I even take into account time and comfort lost.

      He’s called back again twice, and it’s the same freaking question, “any movement on work from home?”

      We all know the answer.

  • @restingboredface@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    502 years ago

    I love this news and all but let’s remember that Forbes is a hot garbage web magazine that is perpetuating a lot of the corporate narrative about how wfh is dying and how businesses need to bring people back because “culture”.

    I think they are trying to play both sides of the issue to keep those juicy clicks rolling into their site.

    • Dizzy Devil Ducky
      link
      fedilink
      English
      152 years ago

      Office culture, in my eyes, has about as much actual culture as a freshly sterilized petri dish.

      • @Patches@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        Freshly Sterilized Petri Fish is about as neutral as you can get.

        Office culture is far more hostile to the worker than that.

  • @ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    322 years ago

    Yep. Employees are happier work harder and produce better work than those who are just going through the motions. Fewer distractions and longer commute means less productivity is possible.

    Working in the office is kind of a sham imo, although I won’t fault people who do prefer that face-to-face communication with their co-workers.

    • @PinkPanther@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      182 years ago

      I now spend 7.5 how’s in the car each week.

      Looking for a new job, I found one that’s 1.5 hours away I’ve way - however, they offer 3 days home per week, 2 mandatory in the office. That means less driving for me (if I get the job)!

    • @peril33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 years ago

      The key here is choice. Let the employees decide. Don’t force your bullshit policies on everyone

  • @stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    242 years ago

    It’ll end up being something also to do with managers of places that permit wfh being more relaxed than in places that prevent it.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 years ago

      I can only speak for myself. I work a hybrid schedule. I am far more productive when I work at home because I am much more comfortable and much less distracted.

        • @Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          92 years ago

          Why is why flexible hybrid schedules are the ideal. Let workers pick what work best for them.

        • @PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Usually the same for me, although I can still be productive at home.

          However, zoom meetings are terrible. May as well just have a phone call. But you can’t have 6 people hash out a problem online like you can around a conference table.

      • @Copernican@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        In the pre COVID days when office was expected, I only was in the office 3.5 days a week. But it worked because everyone was there most of the time and for important meetings. It all broke with fully remote hiring during the pandemic. For those 3 days I’m in, only 33 percent of the team is in. What’s the point at that point when I can’t find a conference room to take constant remote calls. Hybrid everything is the worst of both worlds.

    • @RobotToaster@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      It strongly suggests either causation (WFH -> RG), reverse causation (RG -> WFH), or common causation (Some other factor ->WFH&RG).

  • @paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    142 years ago

    The article itself seem to cast doubt on the remote work policies themselves being the cause of the revenue growth, but that the remote work policies were more a symptom of the company’s culture (more trust in their employees). Though it could just be a chicken/egg thing, where the only reason these companies are so flexible and trusting with their employees is because the company is already doing well, whereas companies that aren’t doing well feel the need to “tighten belts” and start restricting things. To me, it almost seems like the canary in the coal mines. If a company starts restricting work from home, chances are there’s something else already going wrong.

    • @frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      For now, restrictions are mostly coming from companies that still have leases on big office spaces, and who don’t recognize a sunk cost fallacy when they see one. We’ll see how that plays out in the next few years as those leases expire.

      • @hydrospanner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        Enter my employer, who recently was all too pleased to share with us that between now and when their lease is up in 3 years, two other agencies in our building have indicated they’re looking to scale back their space, which means my agency might have the “opportunity” to acquire more space in the building!

  • @Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    14% increase in productivity going from at will part time remote work (meaning many were full time at the office) to obligatory full time remote work for everyone. That means full time remote work is even better than flexible or whatever other hybrid bullshit employers try to impose on their employees.