• Silverseren
    link
    fedilink
    432 years ago

    Isn’t this the video where they used things like a calendar with regular dates and claimed it was a list of Hamas members?

    The entire area they showed looked like the power area of the hospital’s basement, with various things on the walls and such that indicate hospital and nothing else.

    Their only “evidence” in the videos was the pile of guns they showed, which…isn’t really evidence of anything, especially since we have no way to tell if those were planted or not.

    • dumdum666
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      No, they didn’t.

      They claimed it looks like a shift calendar where each terrorist signed in for his shift in guarding the hostages.

    • @shatal@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -52 years ago

      They showed much more than that, including equipment, clothes and a motorcycle that are suspected to have been used in the 7/10 atrocities.

      They do say that they are still investigating and going over the evidence, but show and make it clear that they did find weapons and a command post inside the hospital.

      Regarding the planted comment - well, if that’s what you believe then it doesn’t really matter what they show, doesn’t it? You’ve already made up your mind and it doesn’t matter what the evidence show…

      • @remotelove@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Sorry, but showing pictures of guns, clothes and a motorcycle is not evidence. I don’t care what the news is about or where it’s from. True or not, this kind of thing needs independent reporting and third-party verification. Period.

        When you see stories like this from any source, question everything. Showing pictures that confirm an existing bias is a powerful tool of manipulation, so please remember that.

        Early in the Ukraine war, Russia was pushing the Nazi misinformation extremely hard. By the time fake news stories were debunked, it was too late. Russians were fully convinced that Ukraine was about to invade and old news getting debunked didn’t matter.

        This story is an example: https://www.businessinsider.com/russian-agents-the-sims-video-game-sting-operation-2022-4

        Lets just say there are quite a few layers to the story I linked, so take it with a grain of salt. _It is just an example.

        • @shatal@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -62 years ago

          Of course, 100%.

          Copying what I replied to another comment - I’d rather wait for an official report from the UN or an investigative story from an unbiased news outlet like Reuters (to decide whether this is authentic or propaganda).

      • Silverseren
        link
        fedilink
        92 years ago

        Then why did they lie about a calendar? What was the purpose of that exactly?

        • @shatal@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -52 years ago

          I’m unfamiliar with that, can you share more info? What was the lie and how it was disproven?

          • Silverseren
            link
            fedilink
            172 years ago

            At 5:35 in the video in OP’s link. People who can read Arabic called them out for what was literally a calendar with days listed. The IDF officer in the video claims it’s a list of signed names from each Hamas member for their shift of guarding the room. But there’s no names on it, it’s just a calendar.

            • pewter
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              it’s just a calendar

              I’m very skeptical of this claim right here.

              I didn’t notice anything specific in the calendar itself, but when I used Google translate, the top of the calendar read:

              “For the Battle of Toukan Al-Akher 10/23/7”

              I’m assuming the date is October 7, 2023 and it’s the result of Google mistranslating from Arabic, but that doesn’t sound like a typical calendar.

              I feel like people are trying to pretend the hostages were held nowhere.

              EDIT: I zoomed in and translated again. I think Toukan was Toufan and this meant “Battle of Al-Aqsa Flood”, obviously in reference to the Al Aqsa mosque and using the terminology that Palestinians use to describe October 7th.

            • @shatal@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -62 years ago

              You’re right, good catch.

              It’s a very strange mistake to make on their part, I assume the IDF has many Arabic speakers.

              It’ll be very interesting to see how everything else in the video will unfold.

              • Unaware7013
                link
                fedilink
                102 years ago

                It’s a very strange mistake to make on their part

                No its not, its purposeful disinformation from a group trying to justify war crimes.

              • NoneOfUrBusiness
                link
                fedilink
                82 years ago

                Occam’s razor applies here, and so we look for the simplest, most likely explanation (going by past example). And that explanation is Israeli misinformation. They’ve done it before.

                • @Threeme2189@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 years ago

                  Are you serious? The simplest explanation is misinformation and not an honest mistake or slip of the tongue? The person presenting the information doesn’t speak fluent English and most likely doesn’t speak fluent Arabic either.

              • RubberStuntBaby
                link
                fedilink
                2
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                If they couldn’t read it but claimed to know what it says then it’s a lie, not just a mistake.

          • gregorum
            link
            fedilink
            English
            102 years ago

            Disproven? It wasn’t proven in the first place.

              • gregorum
                link
                fedilink
                English
                42 years ago

                I understand what you meant. What I’m saying is that those claims would have to be proven before they can be disproven. 

    • Melkath
      link
      fedilink
      -192 years ago

      The infowar continues, and Bidens choices have brought in neo-progressives to help the Israelis.

      • gregorum
        link
        fedilink
        English
        102 years ago

        Sure, Biden did this. They found them in the hospital basement right next to the calendar and stack of planted guns. 

        • Melkath
          link
          fedilink
          -1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Ummm…

          You mean the hostage room full of hostages Israel wants back?

          Ya. My money is on full planted disinformation aimed at justifying slaughter of innocents.

    • @conquer4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -12 years ago

      The evil side doesn’t want a cease fire. And no other countrie’s armies are willing to die to try to make one.

    • @galloog1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      … According to Hamas which has demonstrated with evidence that they lie in almost every instance to get ahead of the narrative. So far there has been no evidence that any Israeli organizational narrative has been false.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        So UNICEF has already stated that the Gaza ministry of health numbers are accurate and can be taken as is. I can link the article.

        So far there has been no evidence that any Israeli organizational narrative has been false.

        The video they’re using for evidence literally claims that a random calendar is a Hamas guard shift list.

        • @galloog1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 years ago

          Yes, war in an urban environment is bad. This is why it took a literal terrorist attack to prompt Israel to do it. There’s nothing that could be done to simultaneously win the war and prevent civilian casualties of this magnitude. I am a literal military strategist and there is no way possible considering the tunnel systems.

          • @Maalus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Ah yes, “it wasn’t them. And if it was, it was unavoidable. And if it was avoidable, they deserved it”

      • @merthyr1831@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        “Hamas bombed their own hospital” - Israel Bombed it, according to independently-verified Channel 4 sources. Followed by openly bombing of multiple other hospitals. “Leaked Audio” of hamas taking blame was doctored and spliced from multiple sources.

        “Hamas beheaded 40babies” - Backtracked to one baby, who wasn’t decapitated at all, but in an area where Israeli helicopter gunners admit to blindly firing into civilian neighbourhoods for hours.

        “Hamas killed 1400 civilians” - Backtracked to 1200 recently, including a vast majority being military personnel. Many of the civilians were likely killed by Israeli crossfire or intentionally via “Hannibal doctrine”.

        “Hamas uses tunnels under Al-Shifa” - Literally only a shitty blender video as “proof”. Other attempts such as the above use what Israelis claim is a “guard shift pattern” on a wall, which is actually just translated into a calendar with no names on it all.


        Not going to bother with people like you who wake up giddy with excitement to write off the lives of millions of people because they think there’s some kind of elaborate military apperatus being deployed in hospitals when the reality is that almost every IDF accusation is a confession of the kind of behaviour their own brutes have been orchestrating for decades.

        At this point, you’re willingly choosing Israel’s narrative out of malice, not stupidity.

        • Hatsune Miku
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          whoa those are a lot of claims X3

          ehehe~ i’m really curious bout this lil’ one tho, just this one:

          “Hamas killed 1400 civilians” - Backtracked to 1200 recently, including a vast majority being military personnel. Many of the civilians were likely killed by Israeli crossfire or intentionally via “Hannibal doctrine”

          i watched all available videos during october 7th and didn’t see no helicopter or idf shooting civvies :o

          • @merthyr1831@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            I’m glad you’ve confirmed your biases based on a few minutes of Israeli-published footage of battles that were hours in length.

            PS: get that UwU speak the fuck out of here, prick, you’re trying to justify the deaths of thousands of kids while larping as a fucking vtuber. Eat shit.

            • Hatsune Miku
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -1
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              ehehe, silly~ hamas uploaded the footage online themselves, haha!

              so binary~ pointing out an inconsistency isn’t automatically making out with israel. but it don’t change the fact no helicopter was shooting civilians or the idf was shooting their own civlians X3

  • @skhayfa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    162 years ago

    It’s a basement of a hospital that hundreds of civilians used as bomb shelter. Weak effort of propaganda from IDF because they know US will support the claim anyway.

  • BigFig
    link
    fedilink
    English
    162 years ago

    Wow this morning it was a hostage holding room now it’s a command center, remarkable

  • ShroOmeric
    link
    fedilink
    English
    162 years ago

    Too bad they killed or sent away any journalist or independent organization able to verify their bullshit. So I guess we’re supposed to take their word even of they lied more times than I can count?

  • @Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 years ago

    With the usual caveat “The IDF says:”. Same care is needed to anything “The Hamas says:”. Both sides have their agenda, and it is not necessary involving facts and truths.

    • @avater@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      totally agree on that but even our german state news station is reporting that there were foreign journalists with the soldiers on the spot to witness the storage of weapons and other military equipment, so it seems this has at least other sources besides the IDF

      and to give perspective on our state news, they usually label any news shared by only one source or side as not independently verified and are financed by law by the german citizens and not some big company with an agenda. So they are by all means not perfect but usually a pretty safe source.

      • @Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        While adding ARD or ZDF journalists adds credibility way over Fox “News”, the rooms shown could easily have been staged for the show.

        • @avater@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          While adding ARD or ZDF journalists adds credibility way over Fox “News”, the rooms shown could easily have been staged for the show.

          Yes it could but this is also highly speculative and from footage we have seen it is not unusually to see hamas forces around those buildings.

          • @Treczoks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            What I’m saying is that whatever information comes from that part of the world is usually completely unverified and unverifyable. It’s either “The IDF said” or “Hamas said”. Neither is trustworthy, even if they “show evidence”. Regardless if the IDF shows a room with some weapons and random items they could have picked up from the street, or someone else holding up a dead baby and telling it was shot by the Israelis.

            Nobody down there is there to tell the truth. Everybody is there to convey a set message.

  • Khalic
    link
    fedilink
    52 years ago

    Lemmy’s Hamas groupies out in full force today. Can’t wait for every hamas member to die underground, screaming about their imaginary space man

  • dumdum666
    link
    fedilink
    52 years ago

    „Watch IDF Spokesperson RAdm. Daniel Hagari walk through one of Hamas’ subterranean terrorist tunnels—only to exit in Gaza’s Rantisi hospital on the other side. “

    The footage does not show what the tweet suggests. Hagari does not enter the Hospital through a Hamas tunnel. At least not in the version they have uploaded.

    • @shatal@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      162 years ago

      You probably should.

      Whether you agree or not, it’s always a good idea to hear both sides, otherwise there’s a good chance you’ll end up in an echo chamber.

      If their story is fabricated it’ll fall apart very quickly.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness
        link
        fedilink
        102 years ago

        If their story is fabricated it’ll fall apart very quickly.

        It did. Look at the current top comment.

        • @shatal@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -92 years ago

          I’d rather wait for an official report from the UN or an investigative story from an unbiased news outlet like Reuters.

          It will probably be more reliable than the top comment.

      • @remotelove@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        As an addendum, if you only hear two sides to a story, the truth is usually somewhere in the middle and usually nothing like what people actually had to experience.

        Honestly, what I see is much worse. Hamas stated they were going to use human shields and Israel hasn’t given a fuck. War doesn’t get any more sobering than that, to be honest.

        I listen to a metric fuck ton of propaganda and it takes a ton of work to sort through it all. (I am using the term “propaganda” in the context of strong bias, not necessarily misinformation.) One thing I can say, is that the second you get emotional about news from sources like this, you are becoming vulnerable to actual misinformation. Information warfare is real and just as dangerous as bullets, in some ways.

        Like I implied before, the actual truth to a story about war is probably much worse than people may think.

        • @Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          if you only hear two sides to a story, the truth is usually somewhere in the middle

          That’s a fallacy, sometimes one or the other side is straight up wrong or lying and the other isn’t. Probably not this time, but regardless it’s important to keep in mind.

      • ShroOmeric
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        No you should not. During wars in particular you need third party verification, you can’t be so naive to believe anything from the parties involved.

        • @StorminNorman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          The person you’re replying to said nothing about believing it, that’s an inference you’ve made. Cos they have made a good point, listening to one side only does cause an echo chamber effect. And I encourage everyone to read as much as they can from all aspects in matters like this, but draw your own conclusions. War isn’t simple, it’s complex, dirty, and downright deplorable. It’s why so much study into past wars is undertaken, even those in recent memory that were well documented compared to ones that happened long ago. A lot can be learnt, be it statistically, economically, culturally etc.

      • gila
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -22 years ago

        There is an underground city in Gaza. Terrorists hide there. It would be strange under the circumstances for there not to be tunnels leading to/from the hospital. The IDF’s claim is most likely true.

        The “other side” of the argument is not a rejection of this, it is to point out that these circumstances were manufactured by apartheid, and that they do not justify Israel’s ethnic cleansing campaign

    • Khalic
      link
      fedilink
      -12 years ago

      Who’s we? Are there more than one voices in your head?

      • NoneOfUrBusiness
        link
        fedilink
        82 years ago

        The US’s claims related to this conflict are only slightly less worthless than Israel’s. Remember the beheaded babies?

    • Bone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -62 years ago

      We know, at least some of us, that you won’t give Israel a fair shake.