• @simple@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The video pretty much describes why Fandom is so bad and why many games are moving their wikis to alternative services, and why you should stop using it in general. Some examples include:

      • Ads everywhere, including autoplaying video ads that play another ad when they’re done. There are also ads sneakily inserted in the middle of articles that are related to the wiki, like a Gamespot review (Gamespot is owned by Fandom)

      • A sidebar you can’t remove that promotes their content

      • Fandom hijacked the community’s Mcdonald’s wiki to turn it into a giant advertisement

      • Accounts that are 4 days old can bypass restrictions and easily vandalize pages

      • Fandom sometimes introduces things nobody wants, such as AI generated answers that are usually wrong, take up the top half of the page, and with no way for wiki admins to remove it. They removed it after a lot of backlash but still…

      • When people fork their wikis to other sites, fandom refuses to let admins delete their old wikis. This makes new wikis difficult to start because Fandom usually ends up as the top result on search engines, even if they’re old abandoned wikis.

      • @Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        Oh yeah… Gamespot, that place existed and it was terrible always. Then you look at the other things Gamespot own and realize they all got butchered in terms of reliability and impact.

        • 108
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          When the OG crew left, so did I.

      • Zoidsberg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        Accounts that are 4 days old can bypass restrictions and easily vandalize pages

        What can we do with this information, I wonder…

        • @CoderKat@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          The video also calls out that one of the challenges in moving off of fandom is SEO. The fandom sites often are above the new sites even when the fandom site becomes a pile of unmaintained, vandalized garbage. This suggests that vandalism actually helps fandom.

          The best thing we can do is not visit the sites and don’t link to them, instead using and linking to their new sites.

    • @NightAuthor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      372 years ago
      • Hyper aggressive ads
      • Restricted access to moderation and admin features of wiki
      • Restrictions in layout/formatting to maintain compatibility with ad placements
      • Forced addition of an AI generated section in wikis which contained gibberish or straight up wrong information
    • @T4UTV1S@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      202 years ago

      Worst TL;DR:

      Fandom is a wiki farm, meaning it hosts a bunch of wikis. Also they run on freely available software mediawiki.

      Fandom has a couple main problems:

      1. Barriers to entry are super low, verification for users takes place 4 days post account creation, with no other steps needed by the user. Paired with the limited options that moderators have for editing access on wikis and you have a wiki that is much tougher to moderate.

      2. Ads. Fandom is for-profit. And that means super obtrusive ads that we’ve come to expect. But fandom also shoved ads in the middle of wiki pages, with admins having no control of where those should be placed. There’s also the matter of sketchy ads that are served to minors. Also, some of the ads are outdated but are for subsidiary companies of Fandom.

      3. The Grimace Incident. Basically Fandom took over and turned the McDonald’s and grimace wikis into huge advertisements, wiping out the hard work that the actual wiki maintainers did. They also put in a bunch of factually incorrect information, literally going against the whole purpose of a wiki and really worrying other wikis, because what’s stopping Fandom from getting paid again and repeating the event with their wikis?

      I’m sure I glossed over a bunch of the details but that’s the best I can do from memory.

      • @Pringles@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        How do you find these? You search alternative video players or is there some site where you enter a youtube url and it gives you alternatives?

        • @cherenkov@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          It is called individious, there are many hosts you can choose from. In any instance, a youtube link you paste in the search bar gives you that video in individious. If a certain video is not working, you can use “Switch Individious Instance” to quickly jump to another.

        • snooggums
          link
          fedilink
          52 years ago

          Did you stop using YouTube because of the intrusive ads and monetization?

          Same issue with Fandom.

          • Ey ich frag doch nur
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Tbh mainly because of dumb content. I grew up with free TV so i understand and can life with some ads if the content can be used for free. Also tbh i still sometimes use it for music and that one video gaming magazine’s channel that i really like.

            I feel like I’ve become somehow allergic to youtubers and such.

  • @M500@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    702 years ago

    I loath this site. It’s rarely loads well and the images never load for me. And it’s always so slow. It’s probably because I have an adblocker.

    • snooggums
      link
      fedilink
      352 years ago

      It is slower without the adblocker since it waits for the ads to load if they are not blocked.

    • @Caesium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      182 years ago

      I have been preaching abandoning it for YEARS. It’s even worse on mobile because the formating is so messed up some links just don’t work. And even without adblock, there’s so many ads that THEY slow down the site. Just because it’s ‘free’ everyone defaults to fandom and I hate it so much

      • @M500@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        I think the Doom community successfully avoided fandom.

        What’s to stop someone else from scraping their site and hosting a better one? I’ve never heard of anyone who actually likes Fandom.

    • @mrchampion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      You could always use Invidious or Piped (instance list here) to avoid using YT directly if you want. You won’t get any ads or anti-adblocker bullshit with Invidious, so I usually use that. I’m not sure about Piped, but it seems good too. Unless your point is to simply stop using YT for anything, in which case just ignore what I said.

      EDIT: To the now 8 of you who downvoted me, just, why? No, seriously, why. If you downvote me, please at least tell me why you are instead of downvoting and leaving. It makes me anxious to think that I was a dick or spreading misinformation or just being rude and not even noticing it, and would much rather have someone say something to me so I can at least know what people don’t like. That’s not to say I would agree with it, I might not, but I’d rather know what the problem is so I can agree or disagree.

      • @cyanarchy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        272 years ago

        I think it’s the fact that not everything needs a 20 minute video. There’s a lot of topics that I’m interested in but skip because I don’t have 20, 30, 40, 60 minutes for it.

        • @mrchampion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          That makes sense. I just thought he had something against Youtube (and for good reason), since he only said “Not watching a YT video” instead of “Not watching a 20min video”.

  • @w3dd1e@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    272 years ago

    TLDR; Fandom has a lot of QAnon articles written to make the scams seem legitimate to less computer savvy people.

    My mom has fallen in a Qanon conspiracy world. The people from that world write Fandom articles about themselves to make it seem legitimate. I found them when I started investigating these people trying to convince her to steer clear.

    I don’t trust a single thing on Fandom anymore.

  • @TheNanaimoBarScene@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    272 years ago

    I agree with the premise; fandom sucks. But does it really require a 20 minute exposé though?

    I’ve seen a few links to the Indie Wiki Buddy extension page. I’m not too interested in installing a browser extension to find new wikis, but I bookmarked their listing page: https://getindie.wiki/listings/

  • @Vipsu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Fandom hosts a lot of wikis for long forgotten nich’e games and with these games there usually isn’t enough interest to move to another wiki. When it comes to these wikis theres rarely if ever a team behind updating the wiki and more often than not the content is just being updated and maintained by random invidividuals who just happen to be engaging with the content at given time. The very low barrier of entry makes this possible as you don’t really need to join a team to edit pages or even coordinate with other people.

    When playing one of these games I like to record and share some my observations and findings about games mechanics etc but more often than not the only wiki I can find is fandom wiki that is either incomplete and possibly even abandoned. I cant be bothered to create my own Wiki for these games so I’ll just start editing that one instead because it’s easy, the foundation is usually already there and I don’t need to bother taking any sort of responsibility/mantle of maintainer or admin.

    While Fandom may not be the most optimal choice and there may be better ways to host wiki out there its still better than some obnoxious google document or poorly formatted steam guide that no one else can edit.

  • @Smacks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    212 years ago

    I’ve always advocated against using Fandom. Not much customization and so many ads it makes the platform downright unusable.

    A much better alternative is Wiki.gg, created by some of the original founders of Fandom.

  • @xvlc@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    202 years ago

    You might have heard of alternative frontends to services such as YouTube (Piped, Invidious), X/Twitter (Nitter), etc.

    Something similar exists for Fandom: Breezewiki. This instance seems to occasionally result in errors, other instances seem to work more reliable.

    • Cosmic Cleric
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      no such thing as ethical consumption under capitalism.

      There was a time, long ago, where companies actually cared about their customers, and wanted to sell them good products while making a profit, and they strived for the win - win, and the “customer is always right” philosophy. They took their fair share, and they didn’t triy to squeeze every last dime out of their customers with crappy products.

      Not that that they were saints by any stretch of the imagination (there were definitely bad players back then too) but there used to be a sense of ethics with Capitalism, in America at least, a sense of products being warrantied to work the way they should be and advertised as how they would actually work.

      I have no effing idea how to get back to that state, as it seems like the “lunch for wimps” crowd are running the c-suites these days.

      • Tlaloc_Temporal
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        Regulation. Take the money out of governing, both national government and private directors. If someone makes decisions that affect many people, make that person accountable, either through a competitive market or a functioning justice system.

        The problem is that the fantastically efficient tool that is capitalism will try to increase it reach as much as possible. Killing competition and undermining laws will always be the end goal, so long as they are in anyway allowed.

        The reason companies used to care is because not caring drove customers to the competition. But then there was no competition, and the care evaporated. As long as they are allowed, they will take. Civility can only be guaranteed if profits are on the line.

    • @wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 years ago

      Or we could just… host our own wikis. There’s plenty of open source software for them. It’s not hard. Not everything needs to be federated.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky
    link
    fedilink
    English
    122 years ago

    For just about every single pokemon fan game I play, the fandom wiki pages have pretty much been utter garbage. Either they’re out of date, contain almost no useful info, or have a slew of other problems making it as painful as falling in a bunch of cacti. Same for most other ones I used to visit.

    Will admit, Pokemon Empire having their own site for their fan game is still infinitely better than the fandom pages for it.

      • Dizzy Devil Ducky
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        I think bulbapedia cover just about any official content as far as I’m aware, so long as it’s licensed or made by nintento directly. Anything from the games to the anime to the trading cards to things like obscure licensed Japanese arcade games based on the franchise.

        Don’t know if serebii does all that or if it just focuses on the games since I don’t use it.

  • @dx1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 years ago

    I got special Stylish CSS blocking half the shit on Fandom. IDK about any politics about them but the site is borderline unusable.

  • g6d3np81
    link
    fedilink
    112 years ago

    Regarding SEO, What’s stopping maintainers from vandalizing their own fandom page?

    It would not be difficult to make a bot to update fandom page with a convincing but slightly wrong info, after a few hundred iterations, it’s all useless. Go look at what google recommend and do complete opposite. I’m convinced this will bomb ranking and put whatever wiki they migrated to at the top.