• @Geek_King@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    472 years ago

    I’m so intrigued by the prospect of mining asteroids! The amounts of metals and other resources, including rarer things like platinum family metals is incredible. There are some serious challenges that would need to be overcome, but the first country or company which pulls it off would open the doors to a future where we don’t need to rip up earth to obtain all the rare stuff we need for high tech industry. And with huge amounts of asteroids being in the belts in our solar system, a practically inexhaustible supply too.

    • @AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It is exciting but what’s the market? It’s hard to see this being at all a reasonable cost having to bring it back to Earth, especially unrefined, and it’s hard to imagine it not being worse than current mining, given the flight back to Earth, especially if refining is still on Earth

      On the other hand I’m more excited over mining regolith and water. Such simple things, but will be a huge difference in cost to maintain any off-world presence. Shelter, radiation control, rocket fuel, drinking and bathing, growing food : water and dirt are pretty basic, but just think of the sheer tonnage of supply missions launching from Earth it could replace

      • @Geek_King@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        I think the real value is amount of rare metals that could be harvested, scientists have found an asteroid that is comprised mostly of metals. Scientists think it may be the exposed core of a proto planet:

        Metal asteroid Psyche has a ridiculously high ‘value.’ But what does that even mean?

        So that kind of haul could potentially be worth it, but smelting, refinement and processing would probably be more cost effective in space. Who knows what the future will bring, mining the asteroid belt may only make sense once we have a much strong presence in space, I.E., colonies on Mars, the Moon, etc etc.

    • @echo64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -292 years ago

      This is a lot of exciting words to say “instead of digging up the effectively limitless amount of rock under our feet we can go into space to do it in the least efficient and most expensive way”

      It’s very cool, but I would rather we spend our time and resources on more pressing things, given we have the rocks right here.

      • @vmaziman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        342 years ago

        I would agree if mining the rocks on earth didn’t cause ecological collapses and kill off animals and displace indigenous and exploit underprivileged ethnic classes in post colonial hellholes

        • @vmaziman@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          92 years ago

          I’m sure mining in space will have its own problems but at least it can’t kill our biosphere

          • @schmidtster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            There’s been studies that have found metal particles in the atmosphere, so anything entering and exiting are seemingly shedding particles.

            So it’s likely to cause issues down the road unfortunately.

      • FaceDeer
        link
        fedilink
        122 years ago

        If it’s truly the “least efficient and most expensive way” of mining then you have no reason to be the slightest bit worried, it won’t get done in that case. Obviously.

        • @echo64@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -12 years ago

          This is true, but you’ll also see a lot of investment scams by internet famous people, like funding a space company on the lies of Mars colonies

          • FaceDeer
            link
            fedilink
            02 years ago

            SpaceX is a private company, it’s not taking investment from internet people.

            Furthermore, its Mars goals are IMO the least revolutionary part of what the Starship program is working toward.

            • @echo64@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              32 years ago

              Investment scams from internet people. And I said scam like promising Mars colonization. I did not use the term revolutionary. Scam.

      • qyron
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        I can imagine a sort of a conveyor belt made of miniature cargo vessel with one robotized mining station at one end, cutting away an asteroid piece by piece, and a cargo dock at the Earth side.

        With enough cargo vessels deployed, let’s say one would arrive at each end everyother day, the moment the conveyor belt was full, the mining operation would be swift.

        Assuming a global deal between nations could be struck to have a refinery or at least a cargo dock placed on the moon, to organize large cargos to come to Earth at programmed intervals, it could prove to be a very interesting endeavour.

        Raw matterials price could drop, given the sheer available volume.

        At least it sounds like a diferent sci-fi plot

  • deaf_fish
    link
    fedilink
    English
    202 years ago

    I sure hope we find a way to do this and spread the increase in wealth and prosperity mostly equally amongst all people.

    I would hate it if one guy got super powerful and filthy rich off this and then monopolized the asteroid mining industry.

  • @LilB0kChoy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    172 years ago

    If the movie Armageddon taught us anything it’s that it’ll be super easy to train miners for space.

  • @seaQueue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 years ago

    Can we just get on with engineering a space elevator already? We’re going to want one if we’re serious about exploiting resources off planet.

  • @silencioso@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    My guess is that we won’t be doing any digging on asteroids at first. We will send a Spaceship (with 100tn of cargo capacity) and grab a whole small asteroid. Then the spaceship with the small asteroid Inside the cargo bay will return to earth. It sounds science fiction but don’t forget we have already collected material from asteroids twice (the Japanese returned with 5gr and tre US 250gr).

    You don’t even have to go very far, there are hundreds of small asteroids between the moon and earth. I think we will be able to collect a whole small asteroid in 10 years max.

  • @A_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    Fantastic ! Well, in the next millenia we could see some real progress in this field (if we are lucky). So, lets look forward to the next million years with joy !

    • @PlexSheep@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      I don’t think it will take a millenia. Rocket science is making good progress towards astroid stuff.

      • @A_A@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        I certainly hope your guess is better than mine.

        Did you notice how time and time again science fiction was overly optimistic concerning developments in future transportation capabilities ?

  • @just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    02 years ago

    YEAH, AWESOME! We’ve totally fucked up our own planet with excessive and unrestricted mining operations, let’s move on to others so a few people can get wealthy, and the masses can get their cheap shit from Amazon. Woohoo!

        • FaceDeer
          link
          fedilink
          -12 years ago

          Why are you wasting time and emitting carbon dioxide by using a computer to converse on the Fediverse when you could be out picking up trash from gutters right now?

      • FaceDeer
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Indeed. I sighed before I clicked on this post because I knew a comment exactly like this one was going to be a the top.

  • Asuka
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -32 years ago

    STOP MINING. STOP EXPANDING. STOP BEING OBSESSED WITH “GROWTH”

    b-b-but 8 billion people isn’t enough

    YES IT IS