• @JoeKrogan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1662 years ago

    I’m sure this will sit well with the Muslim population of France. Pro Palestine is not pro hamas nor is it antisemitic.

    • @yumpsuit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 years ago

      They sure are strutting right up to the reigning world champions of effective street protest and sticking their chins out, aren’t they?

      (Your username makes me hear the Mass Effect 3 multiplayer Krogan blood rage laugh, by the way)

  • @febra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1492 years ago

    I’m part jewish, european, anti hamas, pro palestine. Why wouldn’t I be allowed to show my support for Palestine? Israel is trying to starve out two million people with a siege and I am not allowed to say anything about it?

    • @AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      I’m guessing the French government is just seizing on the first opportunity they thought they had to quash the national past time of The French People. Outlaw a protest because you think the majority of the people will support such an action, and you can eventually outlaw all protests.

  • acargitz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    129
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The government of France bans protests… I’ve heard that one before I think. What did the French do after?

    • @thrawn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      Every government seems to know the people won’t actually do that anymore. Peaceful protest was encouraged when the alternative was violence, but now that it’s not, it can be safely banned. The French are ironically a great example— they are notorious for their protests and revolution, yet when the government ignored them and raised retirement age, nothing happened.

      I’m not saying this is good or bad, nor calling for action. It’s merely an observation. I further observe that perhaps this is the humanity tamed enough for governments to once again put the people last, but with the firepower to enforce it eternally. We need good people seeking public office to prevent this, and other solutions.

          • WalrusDragonOnABike
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            Seems like a pretty reasonable reaction to me? What other notable protests would people who didn’t die 200 years ago think of? I don’t really follow French news, so maybe I’m missing other more recent stuff?

              • WalrusDragonOnABike
                link
                fedilink
                12 years ago

                I’d say it’s more of a g8ish centrism. I don’t care about French news in particular. But their protests get a lot of world new attention. I doubt equivalent protests in a place like Hungary would get similar attention, but it would if it were Japan.

              • roguetrick
                link
                fedilink
                12 years ago

                We’re taking about France. I’m American and like BBQ but I’m not going to complain about not following international news when we’re in a fucking thread in a comment section talking about fucking France.

                • @Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 years ago

                  Sure but we’re in world news, not France news. We’re talking about France but you can’t expect everyone to be familiar with French politics.

              • WalrusDragonOnABike
                link
                fedilink
                32 years ago

                As wild pointed out, France has a reputation for frequent and massive protests regularly (compared to places like the US). Like, I was partly joking about the recent news thing because its a meme at this point. Obviously I don’t know what was in the mind of theacharnian, but my first thought was to think about what most recently happened when France made major news for protests against banning protests.

  • @erranto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    372 years ago

    I don’t now how do we still consider France a democracy . Controlling public opinion by banning protests and controlling the narrative through billionaires’ owned media, isn’t what comes to my mind when thinking about democracy, reducing it to the freedom to choosing representatives is a slippery slope towards authoritarianism

    • @joneskind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      182 years ago

      Yeah Macron and his goons are out of control. I’m 45 yo and I’ve never seen a President that tyrannic and authoritarian, and he’s self-proclaimed centrist. Even the right wing governments I’ve known never went that far. And it’s not going to get any better.

      Historic parties have been wiped out from existence in the last 10 years. There are three major parties left. The far-left run by a grumpy old egomaniac (Mélenchon) that ruins any chance of a left win. The center (Macron) which is definitely more right leaning than the historic Right party. The far-right (Lepen/Bardella) which is everything like the current US Republican Party, without the weirdos and outright liars (making it way more dangerous).

      My country is an awful mess right now.

  • @fosforus@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Pro-Russia protests were just fine though even though the methods of murdering in Ukraine are not that different.

  • @Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    29
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Why is like 100% of western media doing this shit rather than discussing imposing real trade restrictions on Israel. (also wtf do all these simps fucking love saudi arabia?)

    • iByteABit [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      If you thought any measures taken for Ukraine were because of morals you’re very mistaken

  • @phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    242 years ago

    Does France have free speech protections? Seems like this would be unconstitutional in the US, but not sure what laws exist there.

    • @erranto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      222 years ago

      They have freedom of the press, but no freedom of speech they way it is guaranteed through the US constitution. in fact they have laws against hate speech and antisemitism.

      • @phoneymouse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        362 years ago

        Interesting, it would seem one can support a Palestinian state and oppose retaliation against innocent Palestinian civilians for the actions of an extremist group without being engaged in hate speech or antisemitism, however much the west really struggles with this concept.

          • @phoneymouse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            122 years ago

            If that’s their justification then did they forget what democracy is about? It’s quite literally the opposite of having the government determine the people’s stance.

            • roguetrick
              link
              fedilink
              62 years ago

              They’re democratic, just not particularly pluralistic. Everybody’s gotta be culturally French, very tyranny of the majority types.

        • Knedliky
          link
          fedilink
          English
          82 years ago

          Because it’s a stick to beat Muslim citizens with. It’s what all conservative French governments have been doing for the last 15 years, more or less openly depending on Le Pen’s (father or daughter) polling numbers. Darmanin is about as anti-Muslim pro-police-state as they come.

        • @Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          “Freedom of speech” as it’s known in the US is slightly misnamed. It’s more accurately “freedom from government regulation of speech”, and the EU doesn’t really have the same protections.

    • hiddengoat
      link
      fedilink
      142 years ago

      They have a lot of things that can be set on fire. That’s a form of free speech protection.

    • @SHITPOSTING_ACCOUNT@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 years ago

      Most European countries do have free speech protections, but with much more limitations than in the US. (IIRC the US would also not allow e.g. speech calling for a lynch mob, as long as it’s specific enough.)

      Various forms of hate speech, including support for terrorist organizations, are covered by those. Terrorist usually isn’t just what the government dislikes; it usually requires (or is subject to review by) a court decision.

      There are obvious arguments against such rules, but there are very few social benefits to letting people support literal child murdering terrorists, call for the lynching of certain groups of people, claim that the Holocaust never happened and should be repeated (sic), or just march up and down the street in Nazi uniforms showing off their right arms much to the dismay of any survivors, their descendants, and the people who would be next on the list.

      The main risk is the government abusing its power to ban all anti-government protests. Europe has decided that this risk is small enough with all checks and balances in place to be worth the social benefit. The US has decided otherwise.