In a shocking incident, horrific visuals are surfacing on the internet in which it can be seen that the Hamas militants are taking a semi-naked dead body of an Israeli woman on an open truck and parading in the city. It is said that the militants after attacking Israel are killing and taking the civilians as hostage. The militants took the dead bodies of the innocent civilians who were killed during the attack in open trucks and paraded them.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness
          link
          fedilink
          -12 years ago

          I’d think Israel’s apartheid policies and ethnic cleansing caused this, but what do I know?

          • @afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            And what is the root cause of that?

            This is like the whole lost cause bullshit of the Civil War. It’s about states rights, ok states right to do what exactly? All you have to do is ask why A is happening and get B and then ask why B is happening.

            To be clear religion isn’t 100% to blame there are other factors but you really can’t underestimate the impact it has on every single problem in that region of the world.

            Why is your skydaddy so eager to have all of his followers hurt each other?

            • NoneOfUrBusiness
              link
              fedilink
              02 years ago

              If we’re gonna blame fundamental human instincts, I’d say what’s more to blame here is ethnicity since being Jewish is both a religion and an ethnicity.

              • @afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                I don’t feel any particular human instinct to kill a women from a different ethnic group and drive her naked body around on a truck.

                It takes religion for that.

                Also “Why is your skydaddy so eager to have all of his followers hurt each other?”

                • NoneOfUrBusiness
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -12 years ago

                  The instincts I was talking about were religion and ethnicity bruh. And I’m saying that if you’re gonna blame one or the other, it’s ethnicity hands down.

        • @purahna@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -82 years ago

          I don’t worship a god, I just don’t like seeing “barbaric savages” rhetoric in the wild. Whatever metric is being used to call them religious savages is equally applicable to America’s christian fundamentalist religious savagery, except that America owns more press.

                • @purahna@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  22 years ago

                  reddit atheism and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race

                  I literally said I don’t worship a god. That’s blasphemy. You should examine why you’re so much more hung up on making your magic sky fairy reddit arguments than you are about the Palestinians getting bombed right now

      • @orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        102 years ago

        Are you seriously trying to argue that a war between two religious ethno-states that are a hairs breadth away from being theocracies isn’t religiously motivated?

        • @purahna@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 years ago

          Don’t you think the more parsimonious explanation is that this is a war of apartheid and colonialism?

          There are Muslim and Christian Israelis and Jewish and Christian Palestinians. Sure, religion plays somewhat of a role in the conflict, but this is no more of a holy war than Operation Enduring Freedom or the Russo-Ukranian war, except that you wouldn’t ever accuse those of being about religion except in the context of this argument as a defense mechanism.

      • @School_Lunch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 years ago

        This video is basically them tattooing “backwards savage” on their forehead. There is no other conclusion. You could have the most justified cause there is, but doing this completely and utterly cancels that out.

  • @Dkarma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -372 years ago

    This is almost as bad as the Palestinian settlement destruction and genocide by Israel. Not quite but almost.

    • @AliasAKA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      100
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      What Israel does is as you described. But can we please not use whataboutism to try and justify barbaric behavior? This is grotesque. Things done to Palestine are grotesque. Let’s just call evil things evil and not try and say “hey cause someone else did an evil this evil is okay.”

        • @AliasAKA@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          Ignoring the ad hominem in your post, I never said Hamas was Palestine. I said that things done to Palestine are grotesque. I said this action by Hamas was grotesque, and replying to the original commenter that it was “almost as bad” as heinous acts done by the recipient of this evil act does not justify this evil act.

          And the Holocaust has literally nothing to do with this discussion, as you mention. Better to make your point would be to actually discuss whataboutism as a definition and provide discussion for why making a counter accusational justification doesn’t qualify as whataboutism (note: the definition of whataboutism is literally responding to an accusation with a counter accusation in an attempt to side step the issue, which I believe is exactly what happened here, eg “this evil act (the accusation) is actually not that bad because of the other evil acts of Israel (counter accusation)”).

          So my argument still stands to the tenets by definition, I never equated Hamas to Palestine (and in fact made the same point that acts done to them were also horrible), and never defended Israel or Hamas. I just don’t believe that killing civilians, or committing war crimes or attempting terror campaigns, is justifiable (by either side).

      • NoneOfUrBusiness
        link
        fedilink
        -282 years ago

        I mean I can’t say I support murdering civilians, but Israel had this coming for a long time. It’s not whataboutism, more just the natural consequence of Israeli policy the last 80 years.

        • @AliasAKA@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          252 years ago

          Saying “this is almost as bad” establishes a comparison, and in the context establishes justification for this event because of the comparator. So your response to the barbarism here is a tacit justification by comparison, or taken in another view, a counter accusation. Which is definitive whataboutism: responding to an accusation with a counter accusation.

          • @Dkarma@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -62 years ago

            Comparing two acts isn’t whataboutism…lol

            If someone slaps you and you stab him back it’s not whataboutism to point out the disproportionate use of force.

            I made no attempt to downplay or excuse the actions of Palestine.

            This is not a debate. I pointed out a fact and you got upset about it. Fallacies don’t come into play here at all.

              • @Dkarma@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -52 years ago

                🤣. Oh look you’re doing exactly what Wikipedia describes (parenthesis mine):

                Whataboutism can provide necessary context into whether or not a particular line of critique is relevant or fair (this is what I did), and behavior that may be imperfect by international standards may be appropriate in a given geopolitical neighborhood (which is the circumstance here).[7]

                (Here’s where you come in): Accusing an interlocutor of whataboutism can also in itself be manipulative and serve the motive of discrediting, as critical talking points can be used selectively and purposefully even as the starting point of the conversation (cf. agenda setting, framing, framing effect, priming, cherry picking). The deviation from them can then be branded as whataboutism.[citation needed]

                You look like a fool.

    • @arin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 years ago

      Both are bad but can we work on our own issues, can’t even make peace within our own Western nations between conservatives and liberals

  • @akrot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -442 years ago

    Just saw Andor recently. Very interesting the parallel between Israel and the Empire. The issue is the overarching reach of Israel throughout the conflict that is only help breeding more radicals. And islamic martyrdom is just another factor that would serve as a cayalyst for more violence in the area. I’m impressed how long Israel defense held up.

    • Yeather
      link
      fedilink
      English
      272 years ago

      OMG this is just like my Heckin Disney showerino!!!

      • Hyperreality
        link
        fedilink
        -42 years ago

        Tarkovski was able to make movies with overtly religious themes in the Soviet Union, because it was ‘just science fiction’.

        Andor is a tv show about more than just funny space aliens. So is Star Wars obviously, but Andor is properly good tv.

        Thankfully people thinking it’s ‘just a Disney show’ or ‘it’s just scifi’ is how stuff like this slips under the radar. See also: trans metaphor The Matrix, Starship Troopers equating right-wing American militarism with Nazi Germany, and V for Vendetta’s ambiguity on the ethics of terrorism.

          • Hyperreality
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            They didn’t kill Tarkovski, despite at one point viewing him as a subversive and dissident. He defected in 1979.

            Tarkovski is arguably one of the best and most influential directors of all time, but you don’t seem to know that much about him. Do you think you’re in a position to be a snob about what you consider a ‘mere Disney’ show?

            In my experience, real filmlovers aren’t snobs. Same goes for music, art, books, etc. Posers invariably are though. They pretend that they’re better than that, because they’re insecure and need to feel better about themselves.

              • Hyperreality
                link
                fedilink
                -1
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                TIL. In my native language the ий in Тарковский (still?) becomes an i.

                Honestly, I wonder if they don’t just do it randomly. I volunteered with Ukrainians. I met brothers who had the same family name in cyrillic, but two different names in roman/latin script. They were in the same group, but didn’t follow each other in an alphabetic list of surnames. Wasn’t a y/i either. Think it was something at the beginning of the surname.

                IRC the Soviets used to use the French method of romanisation (for passports). So the ий became an i. I think at a certain point they started using an english system, in which the ий becomes a y.

                But if you google romanization of Russian and the Russian alphabet, you’ll still see that й can become an i, y, or even a j.

            • Yeather
              link
              fedilink
              English
              02 years ago

              I didn’t say killed I said would have.

              Andor is a mere Disney show, produced for profit and for the masses. I know who Tarkovsky is, I’ve read his book and watched his films. To compare Andor to his works is asinine.

              I’m not being a snob, I liked Andor. I dislike trying to compare real world tragedies and countries that aren’t Nazi Germany to Disney shows. Israel isn’t great but it’s not that level. This is an issue with people on the internet as a whole, they want to connect to recent tragic events and attempt to do so through whatever pop culture media just released. Is why I said the “hecking Star War moverino” and added the soyjack.