• alyaza [they/she]M
      link
      fedilink
      632 years ago

      a core issue for moving wikis is that Fandom refuses to delete the old wiki so you 1) have to fight an SEO war against them; and 2) have to contend with directing everyone to the right place or else you have two competing wikis (one of which will gradually lapse out of date). it’s very irritating.

      • @silverdk@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        222 years ago

        The Path of Emilie community made an extension to remove fandom from Google results and automatically link to the real wiki. Hopefully more communities make something similar.

      • @z3n0x@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        122 years ago

        wait. they have something in their Terms of Service that prevents you from deleting stuff you posted? That sounds illegal.

        • alyaza [they/she]M
          link
          fedilink
          122 years ago

          i’m pretty sure this is because of two things: 1) they actually host the wikis and the administrators of them simply steward them; and 2) everything is licensed under CC-BY-SA anyways, so you don’t retain the right to revoke things you contribute or the right to move the wiki.

        • The Cuuuuube
          link
          fedilink
          English
          82 years ago

          A gdpr request on content you create but do not own just anonymizes the references to who created and edited the articles you contributed to

      • @salarua@sopuli.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        92 years ago

        ugh yeah. especially the SEO war thing, the new website doesn’t even register on DuckDuckGo yet. at least there’s this extension called Indie Wiki Buddy which will hide Fandom results from search engines and redirect you to an independent wiki if you end up on Fandom anyway

            • DarkThoughts
              link
              fedilink
              62 years ago

              Hm, I guess it’s an alternative. I’ll give it a try. The Fandom & Fextralife wikis constantly being at the top search results often pisses me off.

      • TwilightVulpine
        link
        fedilink
        92 years ago

        I don’t see Fandom winning these wars when their site is so bloated with ads. Whenever I end up there I immediately want to leave.

      • Melody Fwygon
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        Hmm. Is there something against linking external wikis on every article you create?

        • alyaza [they/she]M
          link
          fedilink
          22
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          they’ll revert that and ban you for “vandalism” (i assume they have automated sensors for checking this), and/or turn your wiki over to new administrators.

        • subignition
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          It “should” be as easy as a global template inclusion kinda like how wikipedia does donations, but i wouldn’t be surprised if fandom doesn’t allow that to happen

      • frog 🐸
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        The only thing more rage-inducing than getting stuck in a game and needing to Google the information I need… is finding that information on a Fandom Wiki composed of 90% ads and 10% useful content. Especially since I’m usually searching for that information on my phone, due to not all games handling Alt+Tab particularly well, and Fandom is somehow even worse on a phone. I have genuinely had moments where I’ve just closed a game and stopped playing because the information I need isn’t in the game but has to be found on a Fandom Wiki.

        SEO wars only go so far when the user experience on Fandom is so awful that plenty of players would rather scroll down to use the #2 entry in the search results if it means not having to click a Fandom link. They’d only need a few occasions when the #2 entry is a better experience than using Fandom, and they’ll start using the independent Wiki purposefully.

        • Friendship
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          Unfortunately they’re likely well equipped to deal with that kind of situation as it’s not all that different than normal wiki vandalism.

      • Storksforlegs
        link
        fedilink
        English
        102 years ago

        Oh indeed! But websites should still be borderline functional even without adblock.

        I used fandom on my kid’s new tablet (we were looking up video game stuff) and it was unusable, no exaggeration.

    • Owl
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Use an adblocker (uBlock Origin)

      • frog 🐸
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Even with uBlock Origin installed, I find Fandom to have a very high proportion of ads. For a while I tried blocking them individually through uBlock’s element zapper, but that proved a very short term solution. Too often, it worked only on that page and if I went to another entry on the same wiki, it would be loaded down with ads again. I gave up trying. uBlock is really good with ads on most sites, but Fandom has so many that uBlock can’t get rid of them all.

          • frog 🐸
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            It varies between browsers. On my phone (which is how I use Fandom most often - finding out information that ought to be in a game I’m currently playing), I’ve tried several different adblockers and none of them effectively de-ads Fandom. On desktop, Firefox with ublock is generally okay, but Chrome with ublock always has a couple of ads that try to sneak through.

    • verysoft
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I hope the OSRS wiki really influences others, that wiki is top quality, the best out there honestly. Fandom, fextralife and such can all die in a hole.

      I am happy Weird Gloop have decided to host the Minecraft wiki.

  • Aatube
    link
    fedilink
    32 years ago

    I don’t think fandom will do much, remember Uncyclopedia?