Elon Musk says no primates died as a result of Neuralink’s implants. A WIRED investigation now reveals the grisly specifics of their deaths as US authorities have been asked to investigate Musk’s claims.

  • ElZoido
    link
    fedilink
    2012 years ago

    Staff observed that though she was uncomfortable, picking and pulling at her implant until it bled, she would often lie at the foot of her cage and spend time holding hands with her roommate.

    That is just incredibly sad. Those poor animals suffering for that megalomaniacs ego.

    • @bigkix@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -1082 years ago

      Although they were allegedly not treated according to laws, these animals suffered so future human trials can be conducted safely, not because of Musks ego.

      • @Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        572 years ago

        Trials for what? Musk’s implant isn’t new or revolutionary this research has been going on for awhile. But because some egotistical asshole wants to do it people are like wow look at that.

      • @PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        39
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Although they were allegedly not treated according to laws, these animals suffered so future human trials can be conducted safely, not because of Musks ego.

        What a noble sacrifice they were physically forced to make, locked away in cages and hidden from the public eye. /s.

        While we don’t know exactly what goes on in the minds of animals, we don’t need some fucked up, transhumanist vanity project to see that animals have pain, fear, trauma and self-preservation responses that are comparable to ours.

        It’s no more ethical to torture animals in the name of bullshit luxury items then it is to torture children, but it’s just as easy to hand wave away that cruelty by claiming “oh their emotions aren’t as complex as ours and maybe all that screaming and crying and clawing at their face is just how they let other children know they’re having a good time”.

        If you’re casually convinced it’s all worth it, you can fucking volunteer. Maybe there’s valuable discoveries to be made by testing what happens when apologism and “allegedly” is forces sideways down someone’s piss hole.

      • @breadsmasher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        172 years ago

        They still didn’t need to kill so many monkeys for that. Clearly taking the “move fast and break things” approach, leading to 1500 monkeys dead.

        Entirely unethical. That choice is for musks ego.

        • @Jax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          72 years ago

          No no, I think that this person would make a great test subject. Since they clearly see the value that it brings to the rest of humanity, why not let them? Surely they aren’t a coward and would volunteer.

          Surely. Any minute now.

      • nik0
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        A chip in our brain is not necessary enough for animals to be literally sacrificed for “future human trials”

        Go back to farming dogecoin or some shit

      • @catboss@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -12 years ago

        I’d kindly ask you to shut the fuck up if the only thing you got to say is stupid shit.

  • @WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1502 years ago

    Musk first acknowledged the deaths of the macaques on September 10 in a reply to a user on his social networking app X (formerly Twitter). He denied that any of the deaths were “a result of a Neuralink implant” and said the researchers had taken care to select subjects who were already “close to death.” Relatedly, in a presentation last fall Musk claimed that Neuralink’s animal testing was never “exploratory,” but was instead conducted to confirm fully formed scientific hypotheses. “We are extremely careful,” he said.

    Public records reviewed by WIRED, and interviews conducted with a former Neuralink employee and a current researcher at the University of California, Davis primate center, paint a wholly different picture of Neuralink’s animal research. The documents include veterinary records, first made public last year, that contain gruesome portrayals of suffering reportedly endured by as many as a dozen of Neuralink’s primate subjects, all of whom needed to be euthanized. These records could serve as the basis for any potential SEC probe into Musk’s comments about Neuralink, which has faced multiple federal investigations as the company moves toward its goal of releasing the first commercially available brain-computer interface for humans.

    The letters to the SEC come from the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, a nonprofit striving to abolish live animal testing. The group claims that Musk’s comments about the primate deaths were misleading, that he knew them “to be false,” and that investors deserve to hear the truth about the safety, “and thus the marketability,” of Neuralink’s speculative product.

    “They are claiming they are going to put a safe device on the market, and that’s why you should invest,” Ryan Merkley, who leads the Physicians Committee’s research into animal-testing alternatives, tells WIRED. “And we see his lie as a way to whitewash what happened in these exploratory studies.”

    For example, in an experimental surgery that took place in December 2019, performed to determine the “survivability” of an implant, an internal part of the device “broke off” while being implanted. Overnight, researchers observed the monkey, identified only as “Animal 20” by UC Davis, scratching at the surgical site, which emitted a bloody discharge, and yanking on a connector that eventually dislodged part of the device. A surgery to repair the issue was carried out the following day, yet fungal and bacterial infections took root. Vet records note that neither infection was likely to be cleared, in part because the implant was covering the infected area. The monkey was euthanized on January 6, 2020.

    Additional veterinary reports show the condition of a female monkey called “Animal 15” during the months leading up to her death in March 2019. Days after her implant surgery, she began to press her head against the floor for no apparent reason; a symptom of pain or infection, the records say. Staff observed that though she was uncomfortable, picking and pulling at her implant until it bled, she would often lie at the foot of her cage and spend time holding hands with her roommate.

    Animal 15 began to lose coordination, and staff observed that she would shake uncontrollably when she saw lab workers. Her condition deteriorated for months until the staff finally euthanized her. A necropsy report indicates that she had bleeding in her brain and that the Neuralink implants left parts of her cerebral cortex “focally tattered.”

    Yet another monkey, Animal 22, was euthanized in March 2020 after his cranial implant became loose. A necropsy report revealed that two of the screws securing the implant to the skull loosened to the extent that they “could easily be lifted out.” The necropsy for Animal 22 clearly states that “the failure of this implant can be considered purely mechanical and not exacerbated by infection.” If true, this would appear to directly contradict Musk’s statement that no monkeys died as a result of Neuralink’s chips.

  • @inspxtr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    822 years ago

    what really confuses me is how the FDA approves this without a few more years of animal testing and protocol refinement.

      • @inspxtr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        so u’re implying there’s potential corruption? or is there a scenario things are still legal but his (or his people’s) influence is somehow large enough to push it to be approved?

        I really wonder if the FDA publishes the reviews and also the names of the reviewers. The latter may be a stretch and potentially abusive. But the former, if available, might make it easier for outside scientists to further inspect.

    • Zellith
      link
      fedilink
      162 years ago

      The people willing to have this implanted do not have brains. Therefore it is safe.

      • @inspxtr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        122 years ago

        lol I know you’re kidding, but there’s implication of those willing to get things implanted. Society seems to run on hype nowadays. Look at AI and how fast people are jumping on board with trying it, sometimes out of FOMO. Not to say there’s no merit, but if that FOMO feeling spreads real quick, without proper guardrails, Musk will eventually get what he wants.

        • @afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          I don’t think many people will get elective brain surgery out of hype. Even if they would they can’t afford it. You mention AI but chatgpt 4.0 is $20 bucks a month. Cost is a big factor in trends.

          Also I am not sure about your qualifier of “nowadays”. Hype isn’t new.

        • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I think a big aspect is going to be disability. I don’t think any able bodied people are going to be rushing to get this in their skull, but if I had full body paralysis? Fuck it, why not. Well, aside from then supporting these horrible practices and essentially torture on those poor monkeys…

      • Alien Nathan Edward
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        Wait til it does something that employers want. The issue is that this kind of thing can become de facto mandatory.

  • @httpjames@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    732 years ago

    Animal 15 began to lose coordination, and staff observed that she would shake uncontrollably when she saw lab workers.

    These are conscious beings. Imagine being trapped in a lab where the next time you wake up you might not have full motor function?

      • @TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        252 years ago

        Yep, I kinda expect this kind of utilitarian villainy from Musk. But, seeing this happen at UC Davis is an eye opening view of just how corrupted by funding schemes US research institutes are becoming.

        This is what happens when university leadership positions are filled with nothing but econ and business “educators”.

        • @Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          182 years ago

          It’s america as a whole though. Everything has is berning pushed to private industry. America can’t even launch anything into space without the help of a deranged billionaire. America has fallen so hard.

          • @TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            82 years ago

            Yeah, it’s real unfortunate. I work for a university hospital, who’s CEO is always supposed to be a physician. Up until about ten years ago it seemed to help the balance of public good against financial reward. Then we started to see a slew of physicians who went back to school for business management getting hired for upper management.

  • @planish@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    182 years ago

    Unfortunately as far as I know it is pretty standard for monkeys used to test brain interfaces to eventually get infected because of it and have to be put down.

    I’m not sure whether the same problems are as common in humans; humans are much less likely to e.g. yank on the implant, especially if the reason they have an implant is to work around some kind of paralysis. And humans are allowed drugs that animals are not.

  • @serpineslair@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    172 years ago

    This is messed up. It’s like something out of a sci-fi horror film. Have to hope no one is stupid enough to put a computer chip in their brains.

  • Used/Denied
    link
    fedilink
    English
    162 years ago

    The difference in comments here is between those who show compassion for the suffering of animals - and, by extension, humans - versus those who do not and view this as merely political theater in their unlimited support of Elon.

  • @YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    72 years ago

    It’s like the start of a terrifying science fiction movie where things are about to go horribly, horribly wrong.

  • @applejacks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -42 years ago

    People loving poopooing on Neuralink’s animal suffering because it’s connected to Elon, but this is a drop in the bucket compared to the suffering resulting from factory farming.

      • @applejacks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 years ago

        moronic comment.

        12 monkeys were harmed in Neurolink, and you think bringing up the million of animals harmed in factory farming is a whatabout?

        just admit you’re only seething about this because musk’s name is attached, and don’t actually care about animal suffering.

    • @cricket97@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 years ago

      As true as your statement is, it’s not going to get in the way of people here hating on Elon to their fullest extent.

      • @chop@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 years ago

        Hmm. Are you asking in good faith, or to dogpile? Anyway, sure; I can explain why.

        The Gruesome - clickbait because “if it bleeds it leads.”
        Story - words like “story” are often plainly false when the article is a tiny blurb or fluff piece. Thankfully, this article is an actual story. But remember, it’s still bait.
        of How - clickbait because it asks a question it doesn’t answer, baiting the headline-reader to click.
        Neuralink’s Monkeys - oh, another Elon Musk altar. The press can’t get enough of Musk.
        Actually Died - more bleeding leading.

        Headlines can just be content, rather than a tease. This article title intentionally relays no new info.