The website decomp.dev said Thursday that it is shutting down because “the community aspect of decompilation has been broken” by AI, and that projects that once required intense collaboration between people with different skills can now be done trivially with AI. The administrator of the website said that it has become impossible to keep track of which projects are primarily human-led and which ones are done by AI.

“Historically, matching decompilation has been a brutally difficult, time consuming task, on the scale of years for any moderately-sized game with a number of active contributors,” the pseudonymous admin of decomp.dev, who goes by Encounter, wrote on the site.

But recent frontier AI models like GPT-6-Astra have made it trivially easy to decompile a game: “They are significantly better at following complex directions, cross-referencing resources for symbols or debug information, and writing natural code with enough guidance,” Encounter wrote. “It is now clear that, with the right guidance, human input, and code reviews, AI can expedite the decompilation process in a significant way. What is also now clear is that the community aspect of decompilation has been broken.”

AI-powered video game decomps and recomps (recompiling code after modifying it) are everywhere. People have, for example, used AI to put Mario into Elden Ring, port games to platforms they were never designed to work on, or to combine various games in any permutations you could possibly imagine. In recent days, tools specifically designed to decomp games with AI have popped up, such as “decomp.wtf,” which promises to “point the AI agent you already use at a game you own. decomp.wtf turns it back into C, one function at a time, and checks every function byte for byte against the original.”

Decomp.dev was a collaborative website that hosted file libraries and tools for reverse engineering, re-coding, and decompiling existing video games, meaning taking an existing game and recreating its source code. Decompiling a video game can be done for a variety of reasons and is popular in a few different niches of video game fandom. Speed runners decompile video games to find potential glitches or advantages they can use to beat a game faster; hobbyists decompile video games to port them to new platforms or to emulate them (for example, making Super Mario 64 run natively on PC); modders decompile games so they can more easily modify them; archivists decompile games to recreate code that may be lost; and some people decompile games just for the challenge.

Encounter wrote that the use of AI in the community has sped things up to the point where it has become overwhelming to track human-led projects, and people using AI have taken existing, human-led AI projects and have created “hostile forks” of them, where open-source code written by humans is taken and “finished” by AI: “These kinds of hostile forks put little to no effort into meaningfully contributing to existing projects, tearing apart our community fabric.” Encounter added, “anyone with an AI subscription can manage to create a port or static recompilation that functions at a basic level […] While community members put in the effort to decompile a game, opportunists have frequently raced to release a half-baked, barely-functional port from it.”

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    AI decompilation is not free software. You’re relying on proprietary models, for one thing. And you’re starting from a proprietary base program. Sure, you might get something usable at the end, but “free software” means you don’t get sued for it either.

    • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      You’re relying on proprietary models, for one thing

      The development of the software requires propietary models, not the software itself. If I use windows with a propietary IDE to develop software and make it open source that software is still free, even if the build and development system requires propietary software.

      means you don’t get sued for it either.

      Clean room rebuilds are legal under copyright law. If you can prove that you didn’t see the source and only made something based off observing it’s functionality that is allowed.

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The development of the software requires propietary models, not the software itself. If I use windows with a propietary IDE to develop software and make it open source that software is still free, even if the build and development system requires propietary software.

        That’s part of the point, though. Software developed on Windows in a proprietary IDE could’ve been theoretically developed on Linux with neovim, but software developed using proprietary AI couldn’t have been developed in an open source way; there’s no meaningful way to replicate its output for confirmation. You don’t know how it was made, and you can’t produce its output for yourself. You can’t continue development in kind.

        Clean room rebuilds are legal under copyright law. If you can prove that you didn’t see the source and only made something based off observing it’s functionality that is allowed.

        Theoretically. We’re still in a world where the corporations have control over the courts and could very easily spend enough money to get them to rule in their favor.

        Besides, I think it could be very easily argued that an AI decomp isn’t a “clean room,” since you’re directly modifying the built binary.

        EDIT: also worth noting, Windows and Visual Studio’s developers were paid for their work (the developers of AI’s training data were not), and Windows and Visual Studio do not have a major negative environmental impact. Not to mention, learning decompilation is a valuable skill that translates to other disciplines, and abandoning it entirely means that we’re losing that skillset as a society.