• iByteABit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    The main concern is that attested passkey requirement will now be the easiest way to force specific software and hardware upon user. The GraphenOS example is a good one.

    Exactly, and it doesn’t take any effort to come up with software that will make it impossible for most people to even consider doing things a different way than big tech wants them to. Download the wrong app, use the wrong OS, attempt in any way to reclaim your privacy, and all of a sudden you can’t be authorized to open your own banking app because of some bullshit “security” message. What option does that leave you? Either become a hermit and reject all technology with whatever cost that has for you, especially in a decade or two as technology transitions to something completely mandatory for everyone, or fall in line and use everything the way they intend you to.

    • dropdrip@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      This is already the reality without passkeys. The correct response is to bank with a bank that isn’t enabling Google’s monopoly. Pretend passkeys don’t exist–nothing’s changed. You still can’t use your bank’s app without a Google Account if your bank is an enabler of Google’s monopoly. So… again, myopic dimwits are getting angry at something, but don’t know what. They’ve latched onto passkeys though. Amusing.