• rf_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    19 days ago

    I’ve read that the models used to predict the rate of change were too optimistic or an assumption about them was too conservative and thus not very realistic. Now we have data showing the models under-predicted the rate of change, so one argument is that we were already on this path since decades ago, we just didn’t model it right.

    In any case, we’re all fucked so who gives a shit anyway no?

    Is there a name for when we know what the right thing to do is but we keep not doing it?

    • midribbon_action@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      19 days ago

      All of the climate models have adjustable parameters. We are still within the bounds of the worst case scenarios but scientists are always afraid to claim too much. An academic’s reputation is a lot less recoverable than a pop star or politician in the sense that they, and their colleagues, actually take their words and predictions seriously. I don’t want to completely dismiss the effect of lobbying and corruption toward the downplaying of global warming, but making smaller-than-necessary claims is a common sight in most academic fields.