A ketogenic diet promotes tumour growth in the small intestine in susceptible mice. In people, diet advice might need to be tailored to individual cancer risks.
What about a high fat high carb diet?
Obesity is linked to higher risk for many cancers
As long as it’s high in saturated fats and simple carbs, you’ll be fine. But don’t do anything physically demanding, or could be considered exercise.
…asking for a very unhealthy friend…uhm…
That’ll make you fat and bring on metabolic syndrome and all that
Judging from the comments, people are committed to their atkins thing.
I don’t expect this to be well received.Fiber. You need it. This ‘ketogenic’ thing is suicide.
you can eat plenty of fiber and still be keto
Also you can eat none and be perfectly healthy
Atkins explicitly allows fiber and explicitly states fiber carbs don’t count when watching carbs. You should know about things you critique before you critique them.
‘Atkins’ has been thoroughly debunked. People should know better by now.
I was there for the start of that fad, and unfortunately for me, bought the bullshit.Just a personal anecdote, but an Atkins brand meal replacement shake I used to consume had many times the listed B2 levels, because my pee turned radioactive yellow. It said 25%RDI, but ain’t no way, it was more like 250% or more. I’ve never had that happen before, even when taking B2 supplements. It made me cautious what else is incorrect on the nutrition label and distrust the brand. Plus it’s probably not great for your kidneys long term.
If by debunked, you mean repeatedly proven to be the fastest weight loss diet 😅
Hey, poison yourself, that’s fine. It’s not so fine to push it on others.
By debunked, I mean its an extremely unhealthy way to live, and its gonna fuk your guts up. Enjoy your trip to the butt doctor.
Can you point to research that says we require fibre?
I guess you are kidding, but sure. It’s good to get the info out there. All ya gotta do is google it tho …
Would you prefer Stanford, Harvard, Mayo Clinic, or NIH?
I mean a paper that is not an epidemiological one (as they have no ability to show cause and effect) that shows you die without fibre after however long without it
Like life without vitamin C or its precursor goes on for a couple of months then symptoms get serious and you die of scurvy
What’s the time limit on fibre?
Well, for me it was about 42 years, till I was bleeding out my ass all the time.
You know, some of us are hard to convince.
I’m cured, but I’ll require regular colonoscopies for the rest of my life.I’ll see you at the butt doctor when it hits you too. Or … you could act sensibly. Now.
That’s pretty funny, I know it’s not true though as a no fibre diet for that long has to be very high fat and I’ve read a lot about low fibre high fat diets that I know that make shitting easy
Shitting was not a problem. Shitting blood was the issue.
Your gut bugs need fiber to eat. Or they will eventually eat you.
You cannot maintain a healthy microbiome without fiber.
The older you get, the less your guts can tolerate the type of self-abuse you are pushing here.
Additionally, fiber consumption has a dramatic impact on cholesterol processing. That’s actually what finally brought me to the table for a balanced meal.Ah, your story was trying to build up to “fibre is vital” the only studies of fibre on constipation and straining on the toilet showed fibre increased both, reducing fibre improved both, eliminating fibre completely fixed both
The comparison that one made was “adding fibre to improve constipation is like adding cars to improve traffic”
What about high protein moderate fat?
You won’t have enough energy. We need either fat or carbohydrates for energy
What were the mice fed? Is this like a vegetarian low carb diet where the fats come from factory fats - seed oils?
Does “susceptible mice” mean mice that are highly prone to cancer?
Were they also fed carcinogens?
There is reason to think that high meat, high animal fat diets are protective against cancer, as cancer depends on sugar
