• chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    114
    ·
    16 days ago

    The last thing they said. I’ll never have to say “What?” 4 times in a row again.

    • k0e3@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      15 days ago

      What’s the point though? We already know the worst offenders without this special power and not a fucking thing is being done about it.

      Edit: I misunderstood the question. I thought it was for everyone to be able to see it. Yeah, this would be a good one to have to know who to avoid…

    • wuffah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 days ago

      Jeeeesus Christ! I was thinking like “farts per day” or “no-blinker lane change count”. You’re going straight to the show.

  • Tanis Nikana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    16 days ago

    First name.

    “Hey Janine, can you move your cart out of the way, thanks, gonna get by here and go get some ice cream sandwiches.”

    “Excuse me, Ravi, trying to get off the train, one moment, thanks.”

    “Oh hey, you’re a Tanis too, just like me, neat!”

    This will absolutely weird everyone out.

  • TootSweet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    16 days ago

    Is “how much I would like them on a scale from 0 to 10 (with a resolution of like 0.01) if I got to know them at a deep level” allowed? Or is that cheating?

  • TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    16 days ago

    all the others seem a lot more invasive, so I’ll go with their pronouns/gender so I never have to ask and be awkward

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      A recent number would be more useful; last hour, last day. They might have had a food intolerance in the past which pushed the number stratospheric which they have since learned to avoid

      (Me, wheat)

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    16 days ago

    % of how genuine they are with me, easy to figure out who’s worth the time and who isn’t.

    Could be a problem in a relationship tho. I take it back, just the cumulative numbers of fart in a lifetime.

    • zikzak025@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      16 days ago

      The “genuineness” statistic sounds like the sort of thing that would gradually drive me insane.

      I’d probably end up staring into the mirror and seeing an abysmally low number for myself.

    • applebusch (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 days ago

      the units for farts would be interesting. i would ask for total mass of fart for a more understandable value. number of farts would be kind of ambiguous cause someone could have lots of little farts or few huge farts. some asshole would choose those asinine equivalent volume units favored by the compressed gases industry, which no one would really understand.

    • MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 days ago

      Add location too, otherwise that’s just cruel.

      “You’re going to die in 2 days!”

      “Oh god, how? Where? Why?”

      “No idea, get fucked scrub!”

    • 48954246@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      Having kids makes this a burden IMO. It would be very difficult to know that any of my kids would die before me let alone the exact time

  • Doom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    15 days ago

    An icon to indicate if they washed their hands after the last time they used the bathroom.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 days ago

      Put me in horny jail, but I think the world would be a better place if we could see a measure of how likely we could be mating partners.

    • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      15 days ago

      or maybe between 0 and 1. that way it would be easier to see if the topic that I’ve decided is super interesting and won’t shut up about is interesting to the to the other person as well. If I start seeing the number dropping quickly, time to change topics or just walk away.

  • ladybugs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    15 days ago

    None. Someday, some company will build and sell a tool that actually does that, and it will be hella privacy invasive. Actually, it’ll probably just be another invasive feature added to the Ray Ban perv glasses.

    • ladybugs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      15 days ago

      another thing: I think most people answering here aren’t thinking about how it would feel to have the statistic they’re choosing over their own heads.

  • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    Number of cumulative years they would be imprisoned for, had they been caught and convicted of every single crime they ever committed.

    I’m betting most adults are not at zero.

    • Limonene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      15 days ago

      Nobody’s at zero. It’s been said that the average American commits 3 felonies per day. The law is so long that you couldn’t read it in a lifetime. There are more criminalized actions than you can imagine.

    • axx@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      15 days ago

      Crime is such a subjective, context and time dépendant metric that it makes no sense to use here.

      Are you one of those people who thinks things being legal equates to things being moral?

    • Doom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      This wouldn’t impart any useful information in a world where rapist pedophiles get time served and protesters get a life sentence for being adjacent to another crime handing out zines.

    • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      15 days ago

      I feel like this would be a misleading measure. My dad has been self medicating anxiety, adhd, trauma, and potentially autism with pot for about 40 years, in our state an oz is 6 months on first offence. If we only count that on his usual consumption rate, baring any time he’s got extra, tried other things, or the myriad of other dubious things he’s gotten into, he’s lookimg at 1,440 years in jail. If you add anything about quality, growing, having large amounts, that’s going to skyrocket. In comparison, a double homicide nets you 100 points in this hypothetical.

      Put my stoner dad next to a serial pedophile with 10 victims below the age of 12 and my dad looks like a fucking monster.

      • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        15 days ago

        Oh, I’m probably up to 1000 years just for listening to music from the internet.

        Maybe the number should exclude victimless crimes.

        • lps2@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          15 days ago

          Nah, it’s more fun to guess if the dude with 1000 years over their head is a serial killer of was in high school during the Napster/Gnutella years

        • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          15 days ago

          Fuck, I didn’t think about that. The only reason I didn’t starve to death in highschool was the money i made torrenting moves and selling bootlegs of new or obscure films and games. I’d make Manson look like rookie numbers…

      • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 days ago

        You can’t fix it until you can measure it.

        If everyone knew this number about everybody, a lot of stupid laws would change overnight.

        • 0xDREADBEEF@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          This works only if all laws are correct. Otherwise you end up seeing “100 years” for copyright infringement. In the world you imagined, who cares why they have 100 years on em? The never-can-be-bad law is always correct, and a 100 year sentence is always just and good. Otherwise who gives a fuck?

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      I’ve been in possession of weed enough times that my number would probably be higher than someone who murdered a couple of people but never had weed on them.