Police in England installed an AI camera system along a major road. It caught almost 300 drivers in its first 3 days.::An AI camera system installed along a major road in England caught 300 offenses in its first 3 days.There were 180 seat belt offenses and 117 mobile phone

  • Max_Power
    link
    fedilink
    English
    78
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Photos flagged by the AI are then sent to a person for review.

    If an offense was correctly identified, the driver is then sent either a notice of warning or intended prosecution, depending on the severity of the offense.

    The AI just “identifying” offenses is the easy part. It would be interesting to know whether the AI indeed correctly identified 300 offenses or if the person reviewing the AI’s images acted on 300 offenses. That’s potentially a huge difference and would have been the relevant part of the news.

  • @EndlessApollo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    332 years ago

    ITT a bunch of people who have never read an ounce of sci fi (or got entirely the wrong message and think law being enforced by robots is a good thing)

    • @CrayonRosary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      142 years ago

      Calling an image recognition system a robot enforcing the law is such a stretch you’re going to pull a muscle.

      • @EndlessApollo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -12 years ago

        It’s going to disproportionately target minorities. ML* isn’t some wonderful impartial observer, it’s subject to all the same biases as the people who made it. Whether the people at the end of the process are impartial or not barely matters either imo, they’re going to get the biased results of the ML looking for criminals so it’s still going to be a flawed system even if the human element is OK. Ffs please don’t support this kind of dystopian shit, Idk how it’s not completely obvious how horrifying this stuff is

        *what people call AI is not intelligent at all. It uses machine learning, the same process as chatbots and autocorrect. AI is a buzzword used by tech bros who are desperate to “invest in the future”

    • @ShittyRedditWasBetter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -5
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I for one base ALL my global policy on sci Fi novels 🤦‍♂️

      Since the writers are on strike we can have them just write the entire legal code as the writers of black window are actually taken seriously beyond nerds for once.

  • @Boiglenoight@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    282 years ago

    Is the freedom to drive without feeling like you’re being watched more important than the prevention of texting while driving?

    During my commute, it’s common to see people looking at their phones. I don’t know what the effect is without statistics, but seeing an accident along the way is a usual occurrence.

    • @Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      292 years ago

      Can’t believe people still have the audacity to text while driving. I prefer reading a nice relaxing book.

    • Natanael
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      I’m more concerned about error rates and false accusations

      • @ItsMeSpez@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        Doesn’t it say that each image is sent to a human for review before any charges are laid? Might not be the case forever, but at least for now it’s actually a human who ultimately decides whether or not to prosecute a driver.

    • @EndlessApollo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      Yes, obviously. Ffs how is this post so full of authoritarian assholes who think more law enforcement (not even done by real people mind you, but by a machine with no sense of nuance or anything) is the solution to anything other than strengthening a fascist government?

      • @Boiglenoight@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        It’s not authoritarian to use technology to improve people’s lives. If you’re in a public place, you’re subject to being photographed by any number of circumstances both human and machine. How to balance it so that it isn’t abused is a valid argument to have, but disregarding tech because it could run amok isn’t a reason to forsake it altogether.

    • @surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -32 years ago

      No. Your freedom to feel feelings is your problem. If you feel like you’re not being observed right now, your feeling is already wrong.

  • @madge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    222 years ago

    I work in an adjacent industry and got a sales pitch from a company offering a similar service. They said that they get the AI to flag the images and then people working from home confirm - and they said it’s a lot of people with disabilities/etc getting extra cash that way.

    This was about six months ago and I asked them, “there’s a lot of bias in AI training datasets - was a diverse dataset used or was it trained mostly on people who look like me (note: I’m white)?” and they completely dodged the question…

    (this is definitely a different company as I am not in England)

    • @RoyalEngineering@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      “Hookay thanks for the presentation fellas, but lemme ask ya: Was your model trained only on iPhones or was a diverse palette of plastic Android phones from the last 15 years also taken into account?”

  • @Tolstoshev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 years ago

    This will get shut down the first time some politician gets caught receiving road head and the pictures leak.

  • @M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 years ago

    Oh, this can only end in tears.

    And just by chance does anyone know what the damage is done to society by punishing victimless crimes?

    • @Scrof@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -1
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Not wearing seatbelts and fucking around with a phone are hardly victimless crimes and those laws that punish such offenses were written in blood. Never understood people taking safety regulations lightly. It’s not a fucking suggestion.

      • @Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 years ago

        Who is the victim of not wearing a seatbelt?

        Is it one of those ‘you’re not allowed to do things that only affect you because we’re a society’ type things where we should ban video games and sweet foods too?

  • @Asifall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 years ago

    I know this is gonna be a hot take, but I think there’s a huge opportunity to increase road safety using automation. Where I live the police have largely stopped bothering with minor traffic offenses due to problems with racial profiling, which solves the racial profiling issue but means that it’s very hard to drive so poorly you get pulled over.

    It seems like simply ticketing people automatically for driving over the speed limit or running stop signs would be dirt cheap and massively improve driving standards. You wouldn’t even need to do facial recognition or anything, just use the same systems that are already in place for toll by plate to fine the vehicle owner.

    • @randon31415@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      I remember an opening to Seaquest DSV where the captain was riding his motorcycle to the base and a camera pops out of the ground, scans his plate, and he receives an email with the fine when he reached his destination. No other human involved, and this show was ~20 years ago.

  • @hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 years ago

    I’m surprised car companies haven’t already partnered with governments to have the vehicles themselves snitch on the occupants. Why install these camera systems all over the place when the vehicles themselves collect ridiculous amounts of data with greater accuracy? I’m sure the car companies would love the additional revenue stream and the governments would love the greater surveillance capabilities.

  • @Treczoks@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    Am I the only one who considers the text on the camera car (“HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE”) a bad joke?

  • @TheBiscuitLout@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    Cornwall outsourced mobile speed cameras to a private company a while ago, and realised that they, and the company, we’re making money hand over just, and due to Cornwall’s number of tourists, much of that money was coming from outside Cornwall. This feels like a development of that idea. Ethics and everything aside, if they can find a way to roll this out further and increase the flow of money into the councils coffers, they will

    • SeaJ
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      I think deaths jumped a bit post COVID but I don’t think they are skyrocketing. Do you have a source?

      • @letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        I looked it up. They aren’t skyrocketing.

        The numbers dropped due to lockdown, then bounced up and are stable.

        I hate this cult of negativity - just make up how everything is getting worse in order to hand more power to the government.

        The casual and bovine l way it all happen is disgusting.

  • @Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -12 years ago

    I love threads like these because it really shows how flexible opinions are, post about ai surveillance state and everyone is against it but post about car drivers getting fined for not wearing a seatbelt and everyone loves it.