“The only democracy in the Middle-East”
No, no it isn’t. It hasn’t been even a flawed democracy for at least a decade, let alone ever for the people of Palestine.
Its a fascist shithole who’s leadership figured out can stay in power forever if they start a new war.
By all means, a mischievous terrorist state
I wouldn’t call genocide mischievous. Not be a dick but my grandmother escaped Europe during WW2 and explained some of her trauma. Try to never lessen the atrocities, it makes people think it’s normative
- *whose
- And it’s very much a democracy, why, it’s doing all the things it sees the US do all the fucking time!
A democracy that needs to start a new genocidal war every time the leader is about to face justice for corruption?
A democracy that bars 20% of the population from basic human rights and commits genocide against them?
A democracy that operates the most extensive domestic spying system in the world and uses it to subjugate its people?
A democracy that sponsors one of the most infamous pedophile sex traffickers of all time?
A democracy that mass censors its own media to downplay its crimes and the destruction it gets from Iran?
A democracy that states its an ethnostate that is fulfilling a religious prophecy?
Yeah, that’s not a democracy, that’s a fascist, Zionist state, and you’re an asshole.
The United States has only ever been at peace for maybe 15-20 years out of its war mongering 250 years
And also not a democracy
Never was for the majority, no, still isn’t
And it isn’t really much of a democracy, now is it?
Never was
An asshole who knows sarcasm though. JFC
I think its apparent you don’t really know jack shit tbth
For those who tried to read 50 billion likely-AI words before getting to what this is actually about.
The court froze government decisions from March 24 and March 31 that dealt with appointing a new council to the Second Authority. The practical meaning was that the outgoing council would remain in place in its current composition and would not be replaced for now.
In their decision, the justices pointed to what they called a “puzzling proximity in time” between the resignations of several council members, requests by the communications minister and earlier High Court decisions. They also noted that most of the members who resigned from the current council asked to continue serving on the new one.
The court wrote that, on its face, this conduct did not align with council members’ duty of loyalty under the Second Authority Law. It therefore took the unusual step of ruling that the members who resigned would not, at this stage, be counted for purposes of determining the current council’s quorum.
The justices said the decision was necessary under “unique and exceptional circumstances” to prevent what they described as a deliberate attempt to obstruct and paralyze the council’s work during the interim order.
So the court thinks there is corruption due to the resignations, and calls for a hold. The gov says they were following the law so it’s fine.
Human, summarize this AI article for me.
For those who tried to read 50 billion likely-AI words before getting to what this is actually about.
I’m not sure why you would say that.
It’s ~1,500 words, a 5 minute read. The style is like any other news article that isn’t an opinion column, and I don’t see any “LLM speak.”
