GM confirms $130,000 Cadillac Escalade IQ won’t have Apple CarPlay or Android Auto | GM said it was going to drop Apple CarPlay and Android Auto in all vehicles, and now, that includes Cadillac’s l…::Cadillac confirms its new Google built-in infotainment leaves no room for Apple CarPlay or Android Auto. Instead, Google built-in is running the 55-inch infotainment screen.

  • @ante@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    812 years ago

    I’m not the target audience for this to begin with, but I refuse to own a car ever again that doesn’t have Android Auto. What a bunch of anti-consumer bullshit. What are the odds GM starts charging a subscription fee to access apps on these vehicles?

      • UristMcHolland
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        GM is also competing for a piece of the $5.5 billion connected commercial vehicle market, as PYMNTS reported recently.

        The company offers a fleet telematics solution called OnStar Vehicle Insights that features a vehicle locator, vehicle health, driver behavior, performance insights, daily trip summaries and remote commands. This last tool lets drivers lock, unlock and remote start the vehicle from a website or app.

        I would rather have none of that in my vehicle, thanks.

        • Overzeetop
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          I like my vehicles like I like my software - buy once for the features that exist now; upgrade when there is a compelling reason to do so. This rent-seeking subscription bullshit is crap.

    • @Tandybaum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      I agree. It’s a line in the sand at this point.

      I remember back in the 90s looking at these super cool CD players people and installed. I’m sure the nice ones were insanely expensive. CarPlay/Android Auto is a better UI than literally any other option ever put in a car. End of story.

    • @IMALlama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      I think the idea is to get you to pay for data for your car. Tesla is often cited as doing the same thing (eg no phone projection, use the built in), but their unlimited data price is super reasonable at like $100/year. I am not sure what GM is charging, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s more.

      • @ante@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        112 years ago

        Yeah but I also already pay for a phone and am tired of being nickel and dimed at every opportunity. The price of the service isn’t necessarily the issue – it’s the fact that there is a price to begin with.

        • @IMALlama@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          Totally agree. Don’t tell me more reasons why I want to pay like, “your car is a hotspot now!”. I can already do that with my phone. There’s no need to have a data plan per device in my mind if you already have a modem in your pocket.

      • @abhibeckert@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I am not sure what GM is charging

        To be honest, I don’t really care what it costs I wouldn’t pay. No car manufacturer in the world has ever produced a car with a good mapping system. I can’t imagine why anyone would pay anything at all for a product that’s worse than the free one in their phone.

  • @TempleSquare@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    362 years ago

    Ladies and gentlemen… FROM the company that brought us “Cadillac CUE” (all-capacitive-buttons information controls)…

    …Something nobody wants!

  • FireWire400
    link
    fedilink
    English
    27
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I still don’t understand why car brands don’t just use Android Automotive anyway. Most native infotainment systems in cars still look and feel like they’re from the early 2000s.

    That 55-inch interface they’re showing off really looks like some weird 2006-ish concept.

    Edit: Apparently, it’s running “Google built-in” which means that this particular system is based on Android Automotive OS and it’s just running some proprietary launcher on top.

  • @kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    252 years ago

    Y’know what would be great?

    An industry standard system that would work properly with any type of phone, tablet or other mobile device.

    • ThrowawayOnLemmy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      Preferably one that doesn’t run like shit.

      And while we’re at it, require physical nobs/buttons for basic navigation/climate control for safety purposes.

  • @FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    202 years ago

    Give it some time and there will be a guide to replacing the whole thing with a raspberry pi and cheap screen from Ali express.

    It will also probably have more functionality and be less awful to use.

    Fuck all these proprietary systems with their locked down ecosystems. Its blatantly planned obsolescence and will cause a ton of e waste. But fuck it as long as some shareholder is happy right.

  • @BingoBangoBongo@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 years ago

    Call me crazy, but the way the bottom control screen is off centered from the central nav/infotainment bit above it looks horrible and I can’t imagine buying such an expensive car with such an annoying design.

  • @reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 years ago

    Will be interesting to see how many of these they actually sell. I’m guessing it will flop and the factory will be retooled to build a different EV in a year. Same with Hummer line. These models are wayyyyy too niche.

    • @BURN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      I don’t think the market for these is consumers. I think it’s more targeted towards brands/companies. Suburbans are the “go to” vehicle for a lot of upscale valet services and I wouldn’t be surprised to see a lot of those go electric to save on costs.

  • Cam
    link
    fedilink
    English
    102 years ago

    We need a open standard fully open source alternative.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 years ago

    Eh. I have no CarPlay in my 2016 Prius and the proprietary system they have only makes me almost crash my car 30% of the time I use it so I can’t complain.

  • @Hazdaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -12 years ago

    Tons of hate in here, and yet the same people complaining about the lack of AA or ACP don’t bring up the same complains with Tesla or Rivian or Lucid or a few other brands that don’t support it.

    • @Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 years ago

      Personally, Tesla’s support for phone connections doesn’t even come into play because there’s plenty of other technical and administrative reasons to avoid them.

      Also, based on descriptions of AA I’m seeing in this thread, it sounds like I’d rather just continue hooking up my phone’s audio to my car’s sound system and mounting it on the dash than use AA.

      GM’s alternative solution doesn’t interest me whatsoever and it wouldn’t surprise me if it comes with a horrible UX as most companies that make something else but try to also make software suck at it and include other BS meant to make them money rather than improve the experience. It will add no value to me but I’m sure it will add to the cost.