• @lennster@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    512 years ago

    We should really be investing more in public transit, it’s way better than electric cars and could be way more convenient if implemented properly

    • @grue@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      142 years ago

      It all starts with fixing the zoning code. Cars will always be “more convenient” if we keep destroying our cities to make space catering to them.

  • AToM.exe
    link
    fedilink
    272 years ago

    The problem is that citys are built around cars.

    The first question is not how people can reach shops by foot, or with public transit. The first step is always to build streets to stuff and later figure out if you can might fit in a bus route, or maybe a cycling lane.

    • @grue@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      The problem is that destinations are spread too far apart for walking, viable transit, etc. because the zoning code forces developers to build low density and massive amounts of parking.

    • @BoneALisa@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 years ago

      Cities were not built around cars, they were bulldozed for the car.

      Cities were built to be walkable, and had trams for everything else. Then we invented the car and General Motors essentially took america by the balls and forced everyone in americs to become dependant on the car

      • @EssentialCoffee@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        You’re whining about something that happened decades before any of us were even born.

        US cities are built around cars now and that is the only life most Americans have known their entire lives. You have to fix that problem first to get what you want.

  • Talos
    link
    fedilink
    English
    232 years ago

    I can spend 17 minutes driving to work, or 1.5 hours catching buses. Easy choice for me.

    • @SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Right, that’s why we need to stop subsidizing streets and roads, make users pay the cost of them, and put the tax money toward transit. It’s really impossible to ask anybody but the most devoted to make extremely inconvenient choices. Certainly, there are some lunatics who’d drive a car even if it took 1.5 hours, but most people would choose the 17 minute bus.

      Cheaper, sustainable, safer, better for mental health, better for non-drivers (children, elderly, disabled). It just makes sense.

      • @Md1501@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        You are right, if a bus ride was 17 or even 30 minutes to work I would take the bus. But in my area a bus ride is 2 hours one way.

    • @protput@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 years ago

      I also had a commute of about 17min with car. The same route with an electric bike takes me 35min. I’m not out of breath with it and I still have some exercise. I still take my car when it rains.

    • @LazyBane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      Alot of people forget that just becuase a bus commute works for them doesn’t mean it works for everyone.

      Alot of people have a legitimate reason for owning a car, and if we want then to use public transit then we need public transit to fit their needs in travelling.

    • Jerkface (any/all)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -4
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      “The only factor I care about is my own personal convenience. Nothing else will influence my choices that affect others.” That’s you.

      • @decenthuman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        Literally no one is going to quadruple their commute as a good deed. Right or wrong.

        People are struggling for free time from capitalistic slavery as it is.

  • @Saneless@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    142 years ago

    Sure, I’ll just take the…

    Oh wait, I’m in the US and they would have rather destroyed the planet than set up public transport

    Oh wait again…

    • @magiccupcake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 years ago

      You don’t have to replace your commute, if its not feasable. But you could try replacing other smaller trips with a bike if you can. Like trips to the grocery store or doctors appointment.

      Truthfully if the infrastructure to do these things doesn’t exist for you, then don’t endanger yourself.

    • @glasgitarrewelt@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 years ago

      40 minutes is a long ride, true. Maybe buy a foldable bike or a bike rack for your car, park your car outside of the city and reduce car traffic by riding from there to your workplace by bike? It sure would make this city a better place.

    • @Schlemmy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I used to do a 40 minute bike commute twice a day. Once it becomes part of your routine those 40 minutes are easy to conquer. Now I do the same distance by speed pedelec in 25 minutes. I’m faster at work now than when I used to go by car.

      If you can’t make the trip safe though, than you shouldn’t. But you can, like me, start out on nice days and incorporate into your days as a workout just to try an see.

    • @bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      You’re allowed to drive if there’s no other infrastructure connecting point A to point B. This post is dumb because it lacks nuance. There are some cases where driving makes sense. If you live in a city where other options are safe and reliable, you should use those instead. And if you live in a city where there should be safe and reliable options but there aren’t, well that’s what you should be really upset about.

    • Jerkface (any/all)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      “How am I supposed to maintain all my privilege and continue a lifestyle that emulates a landed aristocrat?” Fucking move to the city like the rest of us exploited working class assholes. If you can’t afford to live in the country without externalizing the expenses on other people, then you can’t fucking accord to live in the country. Suck it up.

  • @EssentialCoffee@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    72 years ago

    What purpose does this serve other than alienating the people you’re trying to get on your side?

    You have to have the alternatives in place before you can convince people to make a change.

    Buses already take hours vs. minutes and any road construction that closes stops & routes down adds time and distance to an already long commute.

    If you want people to choose your option, you have to make it an option worth choosing.

    • @glasgitarrewelt@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      It’s more like a chicken or egg problem. No alternative without masses knowing about the problem. It took me 25 years to see what we sacrifice for cars. Maybe this flashy billboard approach helps to shorten that time for someone else.

    • @BilboBargains@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      The British people conceive of the bike as an exotic machine used for Olympic time trials. We would never actually use one to go to the shops. This is fundamentally a nation of bigoted Dunning-Kruger morons that keep voting for the people who don’t build cycle paths and other progressive policy. Every day we fall further into irrelevance. These people think that if we act like Victorians we will achieve the success of that era, meanwhile the rest of the world has moved on.

  • Iron Lynx
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 years ago

    This is a hack of matrix boards like these that I can 100% get behind.

  • @beebarfbadger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    02 years ago

    Okay done. Now that I have eliminated this here my contribution to CO2 emissions, what do we do about the 100 companies that cause 70% of global CO2 emissions? Or is that no longer an issue once my car is taken out of circulation?

    • Jerkface (any/all)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      You live in Canada where there is no other option and yet somehow a significant portion of your neighbors don’t own cars. Wonder how that words, Rab.

        • Jerkface (any/all)
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          You’re using “neighbor” to mean, “people who’s property is directly or nearly directly adjacent to mine”. This is a shitty little trick of sophistry where you pretend to be obtuse so you don’t have to acknowledge the obvious fucking point. I guarantee you, I fucking GUARANTEE you, there are people in your city who don’t own cars. How do they do it, Rab? How do they do it?? There are no other options!!

          • @rab@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Are you ok? My nearest neighbour is 3km away. You need to own a vehicle