• driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The americans knew the ship was coming for a military exercise without ammunition, they couldn’t just seize it and captured everyone and got the ship? I’m missing something?

    • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      83
      ·
      2 months ago

      They could’ve done that with Venezuela’s “drug boats” too but didn’t. That’s because the goal was actually to kill people.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        If they did that they would have a lot more paperwork to forge. The U.S. was claiming that they were running cocaine, but there were reports after one of the bombings that a lot of weed washed up on shore. With a large part of the U.S. population believing weed shouldn’t be illegal, and clearly making it legal would take away any reason for someone to smuggle weed into our country selling the idea of attacking their country for it would have been harder. So they would have had to dispose of all the weed, bag up fake cocaine or acquire real cocaine and submit it all to evidence and fake all the paperwork.

        Instead they just bomb them and don’t have to lie anymore, the evidence was supposed to gone and they could tell the media whatver story they wanted.

    • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      First principles: Even assuming they somehow magically knew there really were no smallarms on the ship, why take the risk of getting stabbed or beaten with a pipe or trapping you and starting a fire or whatever. It would be another thing if the ship surrendered, but no reason to put yourself and your fellow soldiers at risk to go easy on your enemy.

      Deeper reason: With long range missiles and drones being the primary threat to a ship, the biggest limitations are actually locating the enemy ship, tracking it and guiding the missile/drones towards it. Even a ship with no ammo can do that by relaying your position to another ship or shore based missiles/drones. So pulling your ship right next to an enemy one and having to stay there while your marines go board it is not a safe thing to do.

      EDIT: According to the Indian ministry of defense, the ship was taking part in live fire component of the naval exercise. So they did bring ammo to the exercise. Unless they brought exactly the ammo they spent on the excersise, they had ammo.