not much different

Source?

creative

A CPU is not creative.

This feels more like an opinion than a question.

I oppose all use of AI in the arts - it is an aggregation of human creative endeavours stolen and regurgitated to us, debasing our humanity for the profit of the few.

I wonder what the fuck you call “art”.

Even if you’re right and in the future AI produces 80 to 90 per cent of creative work, by volume. That doesn’t mean that it will be any good or that anyone will want any of that.

But again, I really wonder kind of art you like.

fact

fact

^{[citation needed]}

Call me a luddite but I still hate it unequivocally

No matter how good the output, it’s still using tons of power and water, it’s still taking work away from real artists, it’s still stealing copyrighted content from real artists, LLMs and image convoluters can and never will be creative, just distilled and derivative of everything they’ve been fed in training

deleted by creator

There is now just a large gap between what "profesional’ (read: corporate) art is and what is relegated to “hobbyists”.

In the corporate world, time-to-deliver matters. It matters that creating a logo, an ad, or a t-shirt design can be made faster with AI.

However, AI isn’t likely to be used very widely in what people consider “fine art”. Fine art is more about something intangible that AI can’t really assist with.

What current image generation models can do is reproduce shapes, forms and color mixes that are similar to what they’ve seen before. For the high-volume, high throughput world of corporate art, AI image generation is reducing the cost of goods down to something barely above the cost of electricity. For the fine art world, it means the barrier to entry is a bit steeper and a whole lot fewer people will be capable of spending the time creating it.

AI is making some creative jobs into something akin to blacksmithing or horse-based transportation is today. Making things with older technologies still exists, even though most of modern society has moved on. But it’s something that only a handful of people can do professionally anymore. For most people, it’s a hobby or a fun tourist attraction.

deleted by creator

Kill me NOW

deleted by creator

I have no opinion about it. Vaguely interested to see where it leads and patiently waiting for people to stop bitching so much about it. It’s just annoying at this point.

Found in my PM for some reason because PMs are stupid but anyway:

over time they will also begin to create creative things.

How? Please explain mathematically.

I hope you understand what I mean

I certainly don’t.