noumenon@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 days agoWhich model of good and evil, if not somehow both, do you think is more accurate?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square14linkfedilinkarrow-up141arrow-down13
arrow-up138arrow-down1imageWhich model of good and evil, if not somehow both, do you think is more accurate?lemmy.worldnoumenon@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 days agomessage-square14linkfedilink
minus-squareMultiplexer@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up57arrow-down3·edit-29 days agoNeither. The universe itself is neutral as fuck. Good and evil are man-made distinctions that constantly change depending on who happens to define them.
minus-squareLOGIC💣@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down3·8 days agoJust because they’re man-made distinctions doesn’t mean that they cannot be discussed or don’t have beginnings.
minus-squareMultiplexer@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down1·edit-28 days agoSure. But the beginning is a hen/egg discussion per definition. And for the distinctions… There are currently about 8 billion different ones. Discussing those as if there was an absolute answer doesn’t make sense.
minus-squaregnomesaiyan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·8 days ago“Nature does not make mistakes. Right and wrong are human constructs.” –Frank Herbert
Neither.
The universe itself is neutral as fuck.
Good and evil are man-made distinctions that constantly change depending on who happens to define them.
Just because they’re man-made distinctions doesn’t mean that they cannot be discussed or don’t have beginnings.
Sure.
But the beginning is a hen/egg discussion per definition.
And for the distinctions… There are currently about 8 billion different ones.
Discussing those as if there was an absolute answer doesn’t make sense.
“Nature does not make mistakes. Right and wrong are human constructs.” –Frank Herbert