• @const_void@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2332 years ago

    Great for the fediverse but also weird reason to jump ship. All the other bullshit was fine, but “whoa they changed the logo now I’m out”?

    • Action Bastard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      322 years ago

      I’ve already had several non-tech people say something along the lines of “What the heck is this X thing on my phone?”

      I gotta wonder how many other people are just impulse uninstalling something they don’t recognize off their phone as well, since ol’ Musky boi did this with basically zero user notice as well.

    • @socsa@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Because tweeting and being on Twitter is culturally relevant. Twxing and being on =…,/‘’''°°X°°""/,…= is sad and cringe.

      People run away from things which are sad and cringe.

    • @Szymon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      This will be one of the first “in your face” things that is immediately noticable by a finicky user base that only understands and associates value to popular brands. Musk just removed the popular and familiar brand that people are comfortable with, so why would those people stay?

    • Hextic
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      Made a mastodon account yesterday mainly out of curiosity. Never been to Twitter.

      So they might be counting just me lol

    • @TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      None of it was fine, people have been browsing for alternatives ever since Elon Musk took over.

      At most, many hoped things would ultimately stay the same, which they definitely didn’t. The biggest hurdle is that a lot of people there are waiting for their friends and favorite content creators to pick what place they will move to, and content creators are extra hesitant because they don’t know if they will have as much following and reach as they used to. I see a bunch of smaller creators pretty much mourning their careers.

    • FlashMobOfOne
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      And probably won’t matter much.

      This user surge will probably go crawling right back in a week or two.

      • danielbln
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 years ago

        Every surge will retain more people as every surge brings more content.

        • FlashMobOfOne
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          That’s true. I just don’t expect this one to be quite so consequential as the others.

      • @paddirn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 years ago

        Yeah, if moving to Threads wasn’t enough to hold people there, I doubt Mastodon will be able to hold them either.

      • @PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        112 years ago

        Definitely I understand your first comment but I don’t understand the second. I don’t think it looks like a swastika but more of an energy drink.

  • Discoslugs
    link
    fedilink
    English
    502 years ago

    It amazes me how badly these billionares are at running businesses.

    Like im an engineer and Not in my wildest dreams could I have destoyed a company like Twitter faster than musk.

    Like Did he do it on purpose?

    • @corroded@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      292 years ago

      It HAS to be on purpose. Nobody can get to billionaire levels of wealth and be completely inept, right? RIGHT?

      • @c0c0c0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        172 years ago

        Begin rich makes one feel infallible. Thinking one’s self to be infallible leads to these kinds of decisions.

        • @Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          It’s probably worse when one has convinced himself one’s suceess so far was 100% personal skill, rather than 90% luck and 10% skill.

      • Discoslugs
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        Lol i just cant imagine that level of ineptitude.

        Am I living in a simulation?

        • @Cabrio@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          The level of ineptitude is common, the combination of wealth and that much ineptitude, usually less so, given being able to afford the best education and advisers. So it takes a special sort of billionaire to be this inept.

          • @Ryantific_theory@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            While that’s true, I think it’s more that rich people tend to insulate themselves from actually driving direct actions most of the time, so we see their stupid decisions after they’ve filtered from the Board, to the CEO, to the VPs, to the directors, to the managers, and finally, to the workers that actually do things. Really stupid things filter slowly back up as impossible, or as they hit snags over weeks and months, so it takes a couple rounds for them to really mess things up. Not to mention people softening the edges as it passes through the chain to make it more reasonable.

            Elon being front and center, and actually ramming things through is what makes this so uniquely inept. Normally we wouldn’t know that all of these terrible ideas are straight from him, and blame could be shifted around to scape goats.

      • R0cket_M00se
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        It’s just the Dunning-Kruger effect at work, he thinks because he successfully ran a rocket manufacturing company to viability that he’s definitely going to be able to run a social media company too.

        Turns out the B2B style government contract model isn’t exactly the same as B2C social media advertising model.

        • @demonsword@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          I’d argue that it’s Drunning-Kruger plus being surrounded by stupid yes-men that agree with everything you say or do

          • R0cket_M00se
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Do we know for sure? He could just be so arrogant he doesn’t acknowledge advice.

      • @Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        It was on purpose. Its completely obvious the powerful right in America wanted Twitter gone. I bet it could have swung the overton window with how much influence it had.

    • @Saneless@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      It’s like he has a bet that he had to destroy Twitter but he wasn’t allowed to just shut it down or kick everyone off.

      Every move has been bad. It has to be on purpose. Is this how billionaires get their kicks?

      • @reverendz@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        The investors were the kind of people that don’t want the kind of on the ground, quick fact reporting that happened during uprisings and the like.

        It can’t be a coincidence. They’re tanking the most popular tool for getting quick communication out.

        • aphonefriend
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          And at precisely the same time reddit goes down the shitter too. And threads. So many “coincidences.”

    • RheingoldRiver
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      I still think if you look at his investors it spells out leaders who want Twitter not to be viable as a platform for coordinating democratic efforts. So yes, he did it deliberately.

    • @whofearsthenight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      They’re not going to go to mastodon, but there have already been a pretty big exodus to Threads. I have a feeling that’s going to be the thing - twitter is going to die slowly mostly in favor of Threads, meanwhile Mastodon and the fediverse will probably continue being a minor player for a while.

      • Move to lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        Threads will kill nothing for as long as it remains unavailable in Europe due to breaking GDPR.

        Bluesky is more likely, particularly given its Twitter’s former ceo building it.

        • @whofearsthenight@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Bluesky just barely hit a million users is still invite only and is largely in a beta state, and though I’m not on it, everyone I know says it’s a zombie platform and they’d rather be on Mastodon for nerd shit or Threads for normie shit. Threads has over 100m users already. The numbers alone make Bluesky not really worth mentioning, and effectively Threads killed it within the first day. Dorsey has also shown a track record of having no idea what he’s doing. Probably half of the things people think about with Twitter come from the community. @mentions, rt, the term “tweet”, etc. The twitter app was developed by a third party and bought.

          As much as Zuckerberg sucks, Meta actually runs like a real company with adults at the helm. Dorsey’s already fucking up bluesky not learning anything from his time at twitter and not making moderation a priority. Brands are already embracing Threads over Twitter and Bluesky because they don’t want their ads showing up next to porn and nazis.

          Oh, and as for GDPR, Meta has already stated they plan for a later launch, and again since it’s a company of (sociopathic?) adults, they’ll actually get it done, but it’s already effectively over.

          • Move to lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Meta has already been hit with antitrust by the EU. Even if they later get around the fact they’re breaking GDPR by datasharing all the instagram accounts (which is where the inflated number of users comes from) they can not get around the Digital Markets Act coming into effect next year which carries a fine of 10% of all global revenue for actions like this.

      • El Barto
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        I remember when facebook changed its looks to mimic twitter (the whole newsfeed launch was part of that.) I can’t believe it. After 10+ years, fucking facebook might actually dethrone twitter.

    • @HollowNotion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      I’m trying, lol. Just followed a bunch of accounts on Mastodon in an attempt to make my homepage more interesting. Loving Lemmy, but while I don’t necessarily want the absolute deluge of bullshit like reddit has, for my taste the fediverse still has a lot of growing to do (and I hope it gets there!)

  • @unwinagainstable@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    102 years ago

    What was Musk’s logic? Was there any? It’s like he ruined the reputation of Twitter and decided to try a restart under a new name but it’s predictably failing.

  • m3t00🌎
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 years ago

    people also left AOL once they realized tf’n browser works without a monthly sub. wrote WordPress after geocities sucked so bad. tech baby boomers? so 2k

  • @rustyfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 years ago

    His master mind move will be revealed any moment now! The great plan unfolds in front of our eyes!

    It’s like watching a car crash in slow motion.