themaninblack@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 1 month agoPhoto enforcement cameraslemmy.worldimagemessage-square73linkfedilinkarrow-up1837arrow-down170
arrow-up1767arrow-down1imagePhoto enforcement cameraslemmy.worldthemaninblack@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square73linkfedilink
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up27arrow-down7·1 month agoI can condone taking down pedestrian surveillance, but people who drive cars should follow the rules or get fucked.
minus-squareTractorDuffy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down5·1 month agoIt is not necessary to install photo enforcement cameras to get people to follow the rules.
minus-squareJazsta@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoWhat better ideas do you have in mind?
minus-squareBlairMtnWarrior@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down16·1 month agoThat would be fine if they did anything to increase safety but studies have shown it actually increases accidents by 3-8% https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095756415302786
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up20·1 month agoFrom that study: “red light running photo enforcement installed experienced 4 percent reduction in fatal crashes for intersections with multilane approaches, and 48 percent reduction for intersections with single-lane approaches.” Reduction means LESS.
I can condone taking down pedestrian surveillance, but people who drive cars should follow the rules or get fucked.
It is not necessary to install photo enforcement cameras to get people to follow the rules.
What better ideas do you have in mind?
That would be fine if they did anything to increase safety but studies have shown it actually increases accidents by 3-8% https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095756415302786
From that study:
Reduction means LESS.