• skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Overall it would be reasonable article, were it not completely fucked up by a ragebait headline. They’re obviously not in ‘survival mode’, unless you count ‘survival mode’ as not being able to refresh your cars to the newest model every three years.

    But, there is another way of reading the article, which is that someone on $100k is much closer to someone on $30k than they are to a billionaire. They’re still in the class of people who feed their families by working salaried jobs to generate wealth for others; hating on them is the difference between righteous class warfare versus simple-minded jealousy.

    • MisterOwl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      someone on $100k is much closer to someone on $30k than they are to a billionaire

      Technically true, but somebody making $100k and somebody making $30k still live in completely different worlds.

      From a $30k POV, a person making $100k a year and whining about it is not an ally and should STFU.

      • LotrOrc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Thats honestly crazy If youre making 100k and can still barely make ends meet that should be a sign for someone making 30k that shits broken. The difference is billionaires hoarding money. They should be the ones everyone is teaming up against. Someone making 100k in a high COL area is in a lot of ways really similar to someone making 30k in a low COL area.