• SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 months ago

    I thought that there was a study that showed limited returns on happiness beyond a certain threshold ($75k at the time, which is now surely well out-of-date).

    • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      Those could both be true. People feel like they need $125k more to be secure, but when they get it, it doesn’t make them as happy as they thought it would. They need another $25k more to feel that way.

      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        the issue is they get that extra $125K. And then the start spending 95% of it on shit they weren’t buying before. They don’t get the extra 125K and not spend it.

        It’s called lifestyle creep.

        The ‘poorest’ people I’ve ever met were often part of the 300K+ club. Most of my friends making 100K or under aren’t the ones whining about how poor they are. It’s the people who are buying designer clothes and luxury cars.

        so many people I meet are making like 100-150K a year. but they are spending way about their means on luxuries they don’t need but feel are ‘necessary’. like dropping $500 each weekend going out, which is $2000 a the end of the month. gym memberships, travel, luxury apartments, designer clothes, etc.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think that the idea was that there is a special point where you feel secure and nothing beyond that makes any difference. But that $75k number sounds familiar. It’s probably more like $120k today.