• usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Yep, there is not much way around the fact that meat production and consumption must go down substantially to reduce disease risk. More intensive animal agriculture is worse for reasons like antibiotic overuse. Less intensive animal agriculture substantially raises land use which means more deforestation and more human contact with wildlife and higher disease. See the infectious disease trap of animal agriculture

    The research comparing plant-based meats to animal-based meats generally has found plant-based meats to come out ahead health wise, though a whole food plant-based diet is even better

    • SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      The singular products need to be checked. If consumption of plant-based meat would increase there is a non-zero chance of usage of lesser quality ingredients or the seeking of new additives to compete and produce more while minimizing cost, and then we would be at the starting point.

      • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        We at least wouldn’t be at the same starting point since regardless of what happens, we’d still be with much lower environmental impact, zoonetic disease risk for society at large, number of animals in factory farms, etc.


        Plant-based foods have a significantly smaller footprint on the environment than animal-based foods. Even the least sustainable vegetables and cereals cause less environmental harm than the lowest impact meat and dairy products

        https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/14/8/1614/html