• HalfAHero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Schrödinger hated this cat metaphor, he originally told it to highlight its absurdity.

    However, Schrödinger was also a devout pedophile and rapist, so I take glee every time his cat is referenced. Fuck him.

    • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Loved my psych professor. When we went over him she made it VERY clear that we were only doing so because he happened to be influential in the founding of modern psychology, but otherwise he was full of shit and a horrible person.

      Edit: I’m an absolute dumbass and somehow mixed up Schrödinger and Freud.

      • HalfAHero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        That was probably me. A sign that I’ve saturated the fediverse with my rant and I should cool it.

        • magiccupcake@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          Still my first time seeing it. And as a physicist who wants to strive to improve my field we should know these things.

      • lunarul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Including the follow up of someone questioning “devout” and getting that quote in response.

    • bunchberry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yes, he was an Epsteinite, but his point was generally correct. Einstein, Schrödinger, and Bell all recognized that the orthodox interpretation of quantum mechanics makes no sense because it postulates a transition from quantum to classical with no explanation of how this actually occurs. They would not have liked Many Worlds either because it does not actually get rid of the transition, it just claims the classical world is an illusion so it shifts the transition to something happening in your brain, but then doesn’t explain how your brain could possibly create a world of discrete events happening in 3D space from a world where no discrete events ever happen that is just one giant continuous wave evolving in an infinite-dimensional space as there is no clear way to map the latter onto the former. Bell was around when Many Worlds was becoming popularized and so he did comment on it and pointed out it is nonsense and Everett never demonstrated any way to carry out this mapping consistently.