• barnaclebutt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    237 hours ago

    This is why it is so important to find exploits for current gen consoles. It is not about piracy, it is about preservation. You don’t own a game that requires the internet, or a fucking download code Nintendo.

  • @Ksin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3512 hours ago

    It’s astonishing to me how even right here on Lemmy so many people still misunderstand what this is about with comments saying that piracy fixes it or that downloading the game installer solves the issue. The games where those things are options aren’t what this effort is about, this is about games like Darkspore, Defiance, Tabula Rasa, and our prototypical example The Crew, where there is no one who can play them no matter where, how, or when, they acquired the game, it is impossible to play for anyone, the whole piece of art has been destroyed.

    Honestly if we can’t even communicate what the movement is about to those who aught to be our base it really does not bode well for gaining any kind of wider traction.

    • ProdigalFrogOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1211 hours ago

      I think the issue is that, as with reddit, a lot of people are only reading the headline and commenting.

    • @RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -810 hours ago

      The thing is when you created your account you agreed to the fact that it isn’t your game. What you agreed to was a game that they own and control and you can participate in. You might not like the results when they close the game but you chose to start playing that game to begin with.

      • @MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        No, i didn’t. And neither did you or understood half of it, if you’re not a jurist. Which should make ToS without a simple language section atop illegal, imo.

        • @RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 hours ago

          Yes, you did agree to these terms. It’s usually in the first few paragraphs. Try looking them up sometimes and look for words like “limited” and “conditional”

      • @Adalast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        87 hours ago

        Yeah, but a contract that you cannot negotiate before signing isn’t really a contract is it? It is a gate keeper. A gun to the head. An “agree to this or else”. In the modern world, one can do essentially nothing without signing a EULA. Want to get a job without signing one? Good luck. Want to play a game? Not many of them. Want to shop online, look at art, communicate with friends and family. Many of the most integral parts of maintaining our mental health are being put behind abusive “contracts” that strip us of any rights we think we have. Community, leisure, socialization, entertainment, all of the primary avenues in the modern world have predominantly become privatized and every one of those comes at a pretty steep nonmonetary cost.

          • @samus12345@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            56 hours ago

            You can also choose to call them out on having anti-consumer practices. You are entitled to criticize shitty business practices.

            • @RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              05 hours ago

              I wouldn’t call this a shitty business practice. You agreed to a game they own and control. You went into the game knowing this. If they are losing money on the game why should they lose more just to “preserve” the game after shutting down?

              • @samus12345@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                35 hours ago

                They don’t have to. They can release the code and let people run their own servers once they’re no longer interested in doing so. This costs them nothing.

      • @Ksin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        810 hours ago

        You’re damn right I don’t like it, I especially don’t like how it destroys art history, which is why I’m part of this campaign to make that practice illegal.

  • heyWhatsay
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1816 hours ago

    I boycott single player games that require online login/validation. Rockstar and Ubisoft are on my blacklist

    • @docmark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      59 hours ago

      I returned Red Dead Redemption 2 on steam after seeing I needed an entire Shitstar account.

      5 years ago I would have just forgotten about it and moved on but in today’s climate, fuck em. They don’t even deserve my $1.40.

  • @randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7122 hours ago

    Piracy is essentially a form of archivism. The digital age literally ended scarcity in digital media and these people were like “well that won’t do”.

    • @RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -110 hours ago

      For sone of these games piracy would solve nothing. How wouldI run an 8vs8 PvP mission in DCUO that players are required to do if there aren’t 16 players on the server? If Im hosting it offline that content is still dead.

      • @Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Private WoW servers thrived. Much of the endgame content required 40 players to collaborate for hours at a time, and they have kept their own dream running for well over a decade.

        You should have the option to find and play with others long after corporate servers are abandoned. Whether or not there are other players immediately available is irrelevant to the issue at hand.

        Edit - and you’re all over this thread licking boots and saying “you signed the agreement!”

        Thanks. We know how license agreements work. They are included in the thing we want to change, when we talk about changing the industry. We want to stop allowing bullshit license agreements. The exact same way many of us want Right to Repair for people who bought tractors with proprietary software.

        • @Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          58 hours ago

          It also allows the game to revive itself. Those 40 players playing pirated WoW could introduce more people to the game. And at the very least, it allows it be run in the future if ever historians should need access.

        • @RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -46 hours ago

          I dont think you do know how licenses work when your complaint amounts to ” I want this the way I want it not the way I agreed to it”.

          You either accept the game the way it us offered or you dont play the game. You are not entitled to get things the way you want them.

          • @CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 hours ago

            You are not entitled to get things the way you want them.

            “You want to purchase something and use it the way you want to? How entitled can you get?”

          • @Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Lol swing and a miss again, my friend.

            Nice use of the word “entitled” - really sums up your stance on the consumer/business relationship.

            The consumer is “entitled” for protesting predatory or unethical business practices.

            The consumer is “entitled” for opposing the ongoing enshittification of entire industries.

            The consumer is “entitled” for wanting businesses to not be able to legally hide behind unsustainable licensing practices that provide no value to society and further entrench the ever-growing rent/subscription model that is squeezing people dry for no reason.

            The entire point - the entire fucking point - is that these licenses are not okay. So, no, I don’t pay for these licenses, but I don’t think anyone should be able to pay for these licenses, because I don’t think anyone should be able to “sell” these licenses.

            These licenses - like many unethical business practices - put the corporation that offers them at a financial advantage over the corporations that don’t.

            Regulations - in every industry - should level the playing field. They can allow ethical business practices to be viable and competitive, instead of being liabilities and risks. The copyright/IP system is an example of those regulations instead being weaponized against the consumer, and needs a massive overhaul.

            And guess what? In a functioning society, consumers are entitled to get what they want. They are entitled to oppose unethical business practices, and use their collective power to try to stop it. Why the fuck would we want it the other way around? Why are corporations entitled to get whatever they want?

            We have every goddamn right to protest those business practices whether or not we do business with those companies - just as we have every right to protest unethical or discriminatory hiring practices by companies that we don’t work for. Even if plenty of people applied for those jobs and signed those contracts, we have every right to protest anyway.

            But enjoy the taste of corporate boots!

            • @RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -32 hours ago

              It is entitlement. When I signed up to play Fortnite BR I agreed to a limited license to play the game as they intended to run it. If Epic kills Fortnite do I have the right to force them to make a version of BR be playable offline? No, because that isn’t what we agreed to.

              Nothing about this is predatory. You simply aren’t getting what you want and are throwing a tantrum over it

              • @Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 hour ago

                Everything about the “rent/subscription” model is predatory, but we weren’t even talking about the truly fucked up stuff, like deeply unethical microtransaction marketing to children ala Fortnite.

                Amazing that you think its okay for children to sign contracts where they agree that any money they give to Epic is gone forever, and that any worthless digital assets they are manipulated into purchasing can be voided and deleted at any time without any recompense!

                (Lol inb4 “it’s the parents job to monitor their kids at all times in case a predatory corporation sneaks capitalism and FOMO advertising into their apparently harmless child-friendly free-to-play game or app”)

                But sure, keep on defending predatory corporations! Enjoy the taste of boots!

                I’ll be over here advocating for stronger consumer business protections! Sorry, I mean, I’ll be throwing an entitled tantrum lol.

                • @RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  07 minutes ago

                  “ Amazing that you think its okay for children to sign contracts where they agree that any money they give to Epic is gone forever, and that any worthless digital assets they are manipulated into purchasing can be voided and deleted at any time without any recompense!”

                  At no point have I said anything that would lead to this conclusion.

                  For the record Fortnite is rated “T” for teens because of the microtransactions.

                  Your “inB4” is moronic. It IS parent’s job to do this. If they don’t have the energy then dont get them a system.

                  You as an adult are responsible for the agreements you make. It is childish to pretend otherwise.

              • @CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                22 hours ago

                How DARE you suggest things should be better for me, the consumer, instead of the way our corporate overlords feel is more profitable!

                Well, that’s certainly an… Interesting take on someone saying things should be better…

  • cheers_queers
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7823 hours ago

    Im honestly so sick of online games that should be offline. I just got a few switch games to pass time on my breaks, and half of them require internet access. One of them is literally a bubble shooter.

  • @Fandangalo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2721 hours ago

    Out of the games I’ve been fortunate to work on, 1/7 require internet, and the 1 was my first industry job as QA. Everything else has been mobile, online required. 5/7 are no longer playable / removed from the internet.

    It makes me sad because my kids will never play a bunch of things I made. I can’t revisit them nostalgically. If I had made something in the 90s, it would be preserved still.

    I played the cards dealt to me to follow a dream and make a living, but I wish the industry wasn’t like this. The money has always been a role, but nowadays, it’s distorted so badly.

  • @rabber@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1423 hours ago

    that’s why i dont buy digital games on nintendo. one day the service ends and it’s gone forever.

      • @rabber@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -821 hours ago

        i buy physical because i genuinely think nintendo is one of the last good game devs remaining. but switch 2 is just download cards. i will not be purchasing it.

        • Owl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          920 hours ago

          “one of the last good game devs” brother there has been so much drama with nintendo being a god awful company the past year ALONE.

            • Owl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              18 hours ago

              have you seen any of their pokemon releases the past years? its actually embarassing how bad the games are in terms of quality and polish, for a game that is the biggest IP in the world.

              • @rabber@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                08 hours ago

                Nintendo has not developed those. Blame gamefreak.

                Check out the new pokemon snap which isn’t that dev. It is legit a 9/10 game. I play it a ton.

                • Owl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  17 hours ago

                  they do own the pokemon IP though, so even though they dont develop the game, i’d argue its still their fault if the game turns out ass. its time they put some stress on gamefreak to do better.

        • @Sabin10@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          220 hours ago

          It’s already happening on other platforms. Doom dark ages only has something like 28 megabytes on the disc.

            • ProdigalFrogOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              16 hours ago

              AFAIK, most PS3 (and even PS4) / Xbox 360 games will play and function with just the disc, an internet connection will just let them download updates to the game.

              It was PS5 and Xbox One where the discs became glorified physical download codes, and did not actually contain the entire game.

    • @leave_it_blank@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      821 hours ago

      That’s why I only buy games on GOG. After purchase I archive the installer, and it’s mine forever. On console you are really fucked.