• barnaclebutt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    182 hours ago

    This is why it is so important to find exploits for current gen consoles. It is not about piracy, it is about preservation. You don’t own a game that requires the internet, or a fucking download code Nintendo.

  • @Ksin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    288 hours ago

    It’s astonishing to me how even right here on Lemmy so many people still misunderstand what this is about with comments saying that piracy fixes it or that downloading the game installer solves the issue. The games where those things are options aren’t what this effort is about, this is about games like Darkspore, Defiance, Tabula Rasa, and our prototypical example The Crew, where there is no one who can play them no matter where, how, or when, they acquired the game, it is impossible to play for anyone, the whole piece of art has been destroyed.

    Honestly if we can’t even communicate what the movement is about to those who aught to be our base it really does not bode well for gaining any kind of wider traction.

    • ProdigalFrogOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      116 hours ago

      I think the issue is that, as with reddit, a lot of people are only reading the headline and commenting.

    • @RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -75 hours ago

      The thing is when you created your account you agreed to the fact that it isn’t your game. What you agreed to was a game that they own and control and you can participate in. You might not like the results when they close the game but you chose to start playing that game to begin with.

      • @Adalast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        63 hours ago

        Yeah, but a contract that you cannot negotiate before signing isn’t really a contract is it? It is a gate keeper. A gun to the head. An “agree to this or else”. In the modern world, one can do essentially nothing without signing a EULA. Want to get a job without signing one? Good luck. Want to play a game? Not many of them. Want to shop online, look at art, communicate with friends and family. Many of the most integral parts of maintaining our mental health are being put behind abusive “contracts” that strip us of any rights we think we have. Community, leisure, socialization, entertainment, all of the primary avenues in the modern world have predominantly become privatized and every one of those comes at a pretty steep nonmonetary cost.

          • @samus12345@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            357 minutes ago

            You can also choose to call them out on having anti-consumer practices. You are entitled to criticize shitty business practices.

            • @RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              123 minutes ago

              I wouldn’t call this a shitty business practice. You agreed to a game they own and control. You went into the game knowing this. If they are losing money on the game why should they lose more just to “preserve” the game after shutting down?

              • @samus12345@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                117 minutes ago

                They don’t have to. They can release the code and let people run their own servers once they’re no longer interested in doing so. This costs them nothing.

      • @Ksin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        55 hours ago

        You’re damn right I don’t like it, I especially don’t like how it destroys art history, which is why I’m part of this campaign to make that practice illegal.

  • heyWhatsay
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1611 hours ago

    I boycott single player games that require online login/validation. Rockstar and Ubisoft are on my blacklist

    • @docmark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      45 hours ago

      I returned Red Dead Redemption 2 on steam after seeing I needed an entire Shitstar account.

      5 years ago I would have just forgotten about it and moved on but in today’s climate, fuck em. They don’t even deserve my $1.40.

  • @randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5817 hours ago

    Piracy is essentially a form of archivism. The digital age literally ended scarcity in digital media and these people were like “well that won’t do”.

    • @RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -15 hours ago

      For sone of these games piracy would solve nothing. How wouldI run an 8vs8 PvP mission in DCUO that players are required to do if there aren’t 16 players on the server? If Im hosting it offline that content is still dead.

      • @Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Private WoW servers thrived. Much of the endgame content required 40 players to collaborate for hours at a time, and they have kept their own dream running for well over a decade.

        You should have the option to find and play with others long after corporate servers are abandoned. Whether or not there are other players immediately available is irrelevant to the issue at hand.

        Edit - and you’re all over this thread licking boots and saying “you signed the agreement!”

        Thanks. We know how license agreements work. They are included in the thing we want to change, when we talk about changing the industry. We want to stop allowing bullshit license agreements. The exact same way many of us want Right to Repair for people who bought tractors with proprietary software.

        • @Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          33 hours ago

          It also allows the game to revive itself. Those 40 players playing pirated WoW could introduce more people to the game. And at the very least, it allows it be run in the future if ever historians should need access.

        • @RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -11 hour ago

          I dont think you do know how licenses work when your complaint amounts to ” I want this the way I want it not the way I agreed to it”.

          You either accept the game the way it us offered or you dont play the game. You are not entitled to get things the way you want them.

          • @Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            8 minutes ago

            Lol swing and a miss again, my friend.

            Nice use of the word “entitled” - really sums up your stance on the consumer/business relationship.

            The consumer is “entitled” for protesting predatory or unethical business practices.

            The consumer is “entitled” for opposing the ongoing enshittification of entire industries.

            The consumer is “entitled” for wanting businesses to not be able to legally hide behind unsustainable licensing practices that provide no value to society and further entrench the ever-growing rent/subscription model that is squeezing people dry for no reason.

            The entire point - the entire fucking point - is that these licenses are not okay. So, no, I don’t pay for these licenses, but I don’t think anyone should be able to pay for these licenses, because I don’t think anyone should be able to “sell” these licenses.

            These licenses - like many unethical business practices - put the corporation that offers them at a financial advantage over the corporations that don’t.

            Regulations - in every industry - should level the playing field. They can allow ethical business practices to be viable and competitive, instead of being liabilities and risks. The copyright/IP system is an example of those regulations instead being weaponized against the consumer, and needs a massive overhaul.

            We have every goddamn right to protest those business practices whether or not we do business with those companies - just as we have every right to protest unethical or discriminatory hiring practices by companies that we don’t work for.

            But enjoy the taste of corporate boots!

  • cheers_queers
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6918 hours ago

    Im honestly so sick of online games that should be offline. I just got a few switch games to pass time on my breaks, and half of them require internet access. One of them is literally a bubble shooter.

  • @Fandangalo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2516 hours ago

    Out of the games I’ve been fortunate to work on, 1/7 require internet, and the 1 was my first industry job as QA. Everything else has been mobile, online required. 5/7 are no longer playable / removed from the internet.

    It makes me sad because my kids will never play a bunch of things I made. I can’t revisit them nostalgically. If I had made something in the 90s, it would be preserved still.

    I played the cards dealt to me to follow a dream and make a living, but I wish the industry wasn’t like this. The money has always been a role, but nowadays, it’s distorted so badly.

  • @rabber@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1318 hours ago

    that’s why i dont buy digital games on nintendo. one day the service ends and it’s gone forever.

    • @leave_it_blank@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      816 hours ago

      That’s why I only buy games on GOG. After purchase I archive the installer, and it’s mine forever. On console you are really fucked.

      • @rabber@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -717 hours ago

        i buy physical because i genuinely think nintendo is one of the last good game devs remaining. but switch 2 is just download cards. i will not be purchasing it.

        • Owl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          815 hours ago

          “one of the last good game devs” brother there has been so much drama with nintendo being a god awful company the past year ALONE.

            • Owl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              13 hours ago

              have you seen any of their pokemon releases the past years? its actually embarassing how bad the games are in terms of quality and polish, for a game that is the biggest IP in the world.

              • @rabber@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                03 hours ago

                Nintendo has not developed those. Blame gamefreak.

                Check out the new pokemon snap which isn’t that dev. It is legit a 9/10 game. I play it a ton.

                • Owl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 hours ago

                  they do own the pokemon IP though, so even though they dont develop the game, i’d argue its still their fault if the game turns out ass. its time they put some stress on gamefreak to do better.

        • @Sabin10@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          215 hours ago

          It’s already happening on other platforms. Doom dark ages only has something like 28 megabytes on the disc.

            • ProdigalFrogOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              11 hours ago

              AFAIK, most PS3 (and even PS4) / Xbox 360 games will play and function with just the disc, an internet connection will just let them download updates to the game.

              It was PS5 and Xbox One where the discs became glorified physical download codes, and did not actually contain the entire game.