Brunette6256@sh.itjust.works to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoI dont want to enter a contract when consuming your product..sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square93linkfedilinkarrow-up1813arrow-down17
arrow-up1806arrow-down1imageI dont want to enter a contract when consuming your product..sh.itjust.worksBrunette6256@sh.itjust.works to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square93linkfedilink
minus-squareDaddleDew@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up29·1 year agoInteresting how we’ve all become accustomed to the notion that “agreeing to arbitration” has just become “waving your consumer rights” and no lawmaker is pushing to have that fixed.
minus-squareMotoAsh@lemmy.worlddeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down4·1 year agoBecause 98% of them are on the corporations’ side because they practice insider trading.
minus-squareSerinus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agohttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_Arbitration_Injustice_Repeal_Act Don’t be too lazy with your both sides bullshit. The Senate version of the bill, S.505, has 39 cosponsors, all of them being Democrats.[6]
Interesting how we’ve all become accustomed to the notion that “agreeing to arbitration” has just become “waving your consumer rights” and no lawmaker is pushing to have that fixed.
Because 98% of them are on the corporations’ side because they practice insider trading.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_Arbitration_Injustice_Repeal_Act
Don’t be too lazy with your both sides bullshit.