• Michael
    link
    fedilink
    English
    37
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    How about taxing the wealthy instead of food? Taxing cars is nice too.

    • @FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      143 days ago

      Wealthy, in DeKalb? You won’t get any revenue that way. DeKalb is mostly just a university town. A lot of the people who go to that university commute from Rockford or the Chicago suburbs.

      • Michael
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Northern Illinois leaders consider reinstating grocery sales tax at local level

        Seems like it’s going to affect more than DeKalb, see the article title.

        Regardless, I lived in a rural university town myself in the past - much more rural than DeKalb. There were plenty of rich people tucked away in their massive homes. At least enough to raise their taxes just a bit to generate 800k of revenue.

        Tax literally anything instead of food, I say - groceries are high enough and not everybody struggling qualifies for food stamps.

  • @huppakee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    163 days ago

    Sounds like they copied their plans from the Party Against Citizens (a dutch comedy satire sketch, name says it all)

  • acargitz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    113 days ago

    Is local democracy functional in that city? Or is it one of those places where incumbents have made themselves impossible to remove?

  • @LilB0kChoy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    72 days ago

    Since so many in the comments didn’t seem to read, the tl:dr is:

    1. There is currently a statewide sales tax in Illinois on groceries of 1% with some items (alcohol, candy etc.) exempt and taxed at the higher state sales tax rate
    2. The state is set to end this tax on 1/1/2026 but local municipalities can continue it
    3. Dekalb expects that loss of tax revenue to be impactful and is considering it at the local level

    There are likely other ways they could make up the revenue but if they wouldn’t be implementing a new tax, just keeping the existing one going at a local level.

    I’m not familiar with Dekalb but I went to college in a college town where the population doubled during the academic year. There were taxes and fees of higher rates designed to impact the student residents more than locals to make up for the loss of residents during the off time.

  • @5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Forget sprawl, groceries are driving the infrastructure costs. Eat less, then we need to build less? /s

  • @Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 days ago

    Devil’s advocate: The city needs money for services for everyone, cars aren’t used by everyone but everyone eats.

    • @frank@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 days ago

      So evenly tax everyone to support everyone instead of proportionally (more money, more car) tax people to support everyone?

      Disagree

  • @cdf12345@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    33 days ago

    Nowhere in that does it mention parking or gas taxes. Where did you pull that from?