• IndescribablySad@threads.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11111 days ago

    Equal treatment irrespective of the sexual features you were born into? What a left-field decision in this clusterfuck of a year.

    • Suite404
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1011 days ago

      It’s weird that a man topless is fine for pg movies, even G probably. But a woman topless shoots it right up to R. Though Titanic was PG-13. I assume it was more relaxed at the time?

      • @frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        511 days ago

        It happened now and then, but it’s mostly because James Cameron gets to do whatever he wants. Any rando director and it’s an R rating. If PG-13 movies get to show a female-presenting nipple at all, like the Fifth Element, they will be very brief, often from the side, and may not even be in focus. They’re probably not using makeup or other techniques to make the nipples stand out.

        Same with Wolf of Wall Street, but on the next level up. Scorsese directs and argues against an NC-17 rating (which is considered a box office death sentence).

        Hollywood is a very nepotistic industry, and the ratings system is no exception. Most of the rules for ratings aren’t even written down. There are unwritten rules that even the general public figures out (like only getting one f-bomb in a PG-13 movie), but they can be cast aside when a major director or producer gets on the phone and causes a fuss.

      • @ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        411 days ago

        There are quite a few PG-13 where women are topless. Boobs don’t automatically get an R rating. Everything else being equal, I believe it has to be topless in a sexual context to elicit an R rating.

  • don
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4211 days ago

    Men aren’t even referred to as having breasts because they’re so much smaller, but a really long time ago some people dictated that women should keep that shit covered up, ostensibly because giblets started tingling at the sight. Meanwhile, cultures exist that make no distinction between the two, and casually ask the rest of the world, “Fucking… why?”

    • @Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1611 days ago

      I think this is a disingenuous take. Different cultures all have their own taboos. Is it all social constructs? Yea, sure, but that doesn’t make them invalid within context. By nature they aren’t logical.

      • @WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        811 days ago

        They’re cultural creations. They were created by human beings, and WE have the power to change them. If we want something to stop being a taboo, we can simply will it to be as such.

      • @chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        511 days ago

        The taboos are pretty logical. They’ve swung back and forth over the years. For example, the Victorian era of prudishness appeared not long after the syphilis epidemic.

      • @angrystego@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 days ago

        Why is it disingenous? It shows just what you said by the end - that it’s not logical. Doesn’t that make them kind of invalid? What kind of context would make them valid? Just history?

  • @hexonxonx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3710 days ago

    For those concerned (or hopeful) about vast hordes of topless Minnesota women roaming the streets: They made boobs legal in Ontario in the mid 90’s and I’ve NEVER seen any women go topless in public. I’m sure it happens, but it’s extremely rare. Heck, most guys still swim in t-shirts up here.

    The point of the law in Canada was to make a point that if men and women are to be equal, the law should reflect that. Of course in the US it’s about sex and not equality.

    • @bluewing@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      510 days ago

      The mosquitos alone are gong to keep them covered. As a man, I don’t go without a shirt when outside.

      • @Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 days ago

        Dude. Mosquitos are fucking assholes! I once went hiking in a tshirt and I walked by an area wiyh stagnant water and lots of mosquitos. Guess what was their preferred part to sting? I made a point to have full sleeves after that.

    • @KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19 days ago

      Exposed female breasts are legal in BC, or maybe just the greater Vancouver area, and I’ve seen more than a handful of wild, naked, boobies in my time there.

  • @Quilotoa@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2111 days ago

    I lived in Haiti for 3 years where the top of a woman was not considered private. Within 2 months, looking at a woman’s breast was about as exciting as looking at her elbow. Weirdly, they switched back to being sexual after returning to Canada.

        • @overcooked_sap@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          411 days ago

          At least in Ontario. Women have had the same right as men to go topless anywhere a man would. This is since 1996, I think that’s when that Gretchen lass took it to court.

          • @frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 days ago

            To be clear, I would expect that if it’s by culture, then it’d be very common to see women walking around topless and nobody pays it much attention.

            Lots of places allow it at a matter of law. There’s been many state Supreme Court cases like the one in OP that say female breasts don’t count towards indecent exposure. Where I live (Madison, WI), those laws only apply to being sexually lewd. Anyone can technically run around naked otherwise, but it’s not something people commonly do outside of the World Naked Bike Ride and protests.

    • @Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      710 days ago

      There is an incentive to cover them for women

      When they stop becoming “private parts” they stop having the effect

  • @BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    910 days ago

    This is DISGRACEFUL! IMAGINE if a CHILD sees a FEMALE NIPPLE! The DOWNFALL of America is Happening in FRONT of our Eyes!

    -People who Worship School Shooters!

  • m3t00🌎
    link
    fedilink
    English
    511 days ago

    like light breaking through dark clouds. release the boobs