Artist here. I don’t use any of those and use my eyes. Using AI to try and detect AI always rubs me the wrong way because the false positive rate is high. I’ve even seen Van Gogh paintings get wrongfully labeled as being AI-generated
I’ve even seen van gogh paintings get wrongly labeled
That’s way less surprising than an indie artist’s art being wrongly labelled. It’s nothing about the quality, just that van gogh paintings are likely to be very overrepresented in the training dataset
A thought: any ai-image detector is a defacto trainer for ai-image generators. It necessarily becomes a kind of arms race in the same way that spam generators test their payloads against spam filters.
My eyes. Everything I’ve seen of AI detectors does not Inspire confidence in me. I don’t feel like I can trust their results due to the inevitability of incorrect guesses, so I don’t bother using them.
Do you really need one at this point? AI images are really easy to notice.
