cm0002@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 1 year agoWaiting for new old outlooklemmy.mlimagemessage-square53linkfedilinkarrow-up1601arrow-down19
arrow-up1592arrow-down1imageWaiting for new old outlooklemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square53linkfedilink
minus-squareflambonkscious@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoHonestly, bring back waterfall development cycles… They we awful and failed a lot, by at least we didn’t have zombie failures being used!
minus-squaredovah@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoDeploying incrementally doesn’t need to mean releasing incrementally.
minus-squareflambonkscious@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoThat’s a great point , but even the degenerates in the windows and office teams make an absolute mess of things and tend to prioritize BS cosmetic changes over actual improvements as a result
Honestly, bring back waterfall development cycles…
They we awful and failed a lot, by at least we didn’t have zombie failures being used!
Deploying incrementally doesn’t need to mean releasing incrementally.
That’s a great point , but even the degenerates in the windows and office teams make an absolute mess of things and tend to prioritize BS cosmetic changes over actual improvements as a result